Lets get rid of everything guys

LEGOMAN · Post by **LEGOMAN** » 04 Jun 2008 16:27

Fuck routines! People do too many far legovers to make it far! What's the fun in that for people? It's abusive for players to use far legovers!

Fuck Shred 30! It's too much about trying to push the limits of math! That's too hard for people to do! and its unfair when they find somewhere to exploit it!

Fuck Circles! People keep the bag too long and repeat tricks! It's too unfair for people who don't practice for it!

Fuck the add system! Even though it doesn't define difficulty everyone thinks it does so its evil!

zach4th · Post by **zach4th** » 04 Jun 2008 17:03

Yeah! Okay...

Someone needs some happy juice!! Just watch Zohan and relax bro.

Benzilla · Post by **Benzilla** » 04 Jun 2008 17:18

he does have a point....although im not quite sure of what that point is..

Psilocybe · Post by **Psilocybe** » 04 Jun 2008 17:50

stupid thread

dp · Post by dp » 04 Jun 2008 18:19

Psilocybe wrote:
Fuck modified! The first-name-basis bullshit is superficial.

I feel no need to defend my statement of:

You're wrong.

calemccoy · Post by **calemccoy** » 04 Jun 2008 21:46

you tell him, danny.

JeffRichards · Post by **JeffRichards** » 04 Jun 2008 22:22

lame thread

LEGOMAN · Post by **LEGOMAN** » 04 Jun 2008 23:19

JeffRichards wrote:lame thread

i really made this thread to show people at acting stupid towards shred 30 and the add system

Eric Chang · Post by **Eric Chang** » 05 Jun 2008 00:54

This made me laugh! But on another note at least there are enough people defending routines + shred30! (Not that I'm good at either:-p)

But I want to join!

Fuck. Fuck. Fuck.
Mother mother fuck. Mother mother fuck fuck. Mother fuck mother fuck.
Noise noise noise.
1 2 1 2 3 4
Noise noise noise.

Ian Brill · Post by **Ian Brill** » 05 Jun 2008 01:08

Fuck oxidants. Whatever they are.

LEGOMAN · Post by **LEGOMAN** » 05 Jun 2008 01:33

well you guys have officially derailed this thread so much i have given up on its original purpose. this thread is now about kyle hewitt

kyle hewitt is sexy and is the best shredder in the world

Eric Chang · Post by **Eric Chang** » 05 Jun 2008 02:12

Fuck Kyle and his sexiness, and being the best shredder in the world.

Ok I'm done now.

King Monkey · Post by **King Monkey** » 05 Jun 2008 08:35

Can everyone please tone down their language?

Spontaneous Spaz · Post by **Spontaneous Spaz** » 05 Jun 2008 08:35

FUCK GLOBAL WARMING! damn its hot here

FUCK POLLUTION AND MOST OF ALL

FUCK YOU AL GORE!

Rieferman · Post by **Rieferman** » 05 Jun 2008 09:22

Regarding (what I think is) the original point of the topic.. One major reason I'll probably never go to another event, is that the competition portion of the event is boring and pointless to me. e.g. Even if David (as an example) doesn't place 1st in an event, does anyone really think he's not the best player there in most cases? Does the "crowd" (usually non-existent) understand the competition? In many years, I've seen far more players wowed by a regular shred circle, and I've seen many more spectators watch those same circles but walk away bored when the competition starts. How many players are there? How many of them compete? How many non-competing players just wish for the competition to be over so we can all get back to shredding?

In other words, what we all love to do (shred) seems like the most important thing to me.

Then again, many feel that growing the sport is the ultimate goal, and that legitimate competitions are the way to spread the word. I dunno about that.

underooninja · Post by **underooninja** » 05 Jun 2008 09:29

Psilocybe wrote:fuck you guys! its called hacky sack

hahahaha yeah!

RawSko · Post by **RawSko** » 05 Jun 2008 10:52

Rieferman wrote:Regarding (what I think is) the original point of the topic.. One major reason I'll probably never go to another event, is that the competition portion of the event is boring and pointless to me. e.g. Even if David (as an example) doesn't place 1st in an event, does anyone really think he's not the best player there in most cases? Does the "crowd" (usually non-existent) understand the competition? In many years, I've seen far more players wowed by a regular shred circle, and I've seen many more spectators watch those same circles but walk away bored when the competition starts. How many players are there? How many of them compete? How many non-competing players just wish for the competition to be over so we can all get back to shredding?

In other words, what we all love to do (shred) seems like the most important thing to me.

Then again, many feel that growing the sport is the ultimate goal, and that legitimate competitions are the way to spread the word. I dunno about that.

competition is on of my favorite parts of each event. I can't imagine NOT feeling this way. Whether I'm in the comp or just watching, it's always interesting and exhillerating.

Fuck anti-competition

Sporatical_Distractions · Post by **Sporatical_Distractions** » 05 Jun 2008 12:36

I think we should bring back the 'consecutive kicks' competition... and I'm being dead serious.

Rieferman · Post by **Rieferman** » 05 Jun 2008 12:45

Rawsko wrote:

Fuck anti-competition

Nice burn

Actually, I officially changed my stance somewhat in the last hour. I finally watched the TO Jam Circle finals video with Jorden and Penske and Johnny and Andrew. That was fun as hell to watch.

Oh wait.. That was a shred circle which is what I said I liked anyways. So maybe I just find competitions that aren't anything like the game we actually play really boring and pointless. That contest seemed pretty much like watching a normal circle, so I enjoyed that quite a bit more.

Side question, how is that competition judged? Is it basically "whoever is most hardcore overall wins"? That seems easy to judge and a good way to judge actually.

professor · Post by **professor** » 05 Jun 2008 12:57

The first round is judged on creativity and the second round is judged based on difficulty. Each round each player gets 3 - 5 runs with the bag. Depends on how the competition is set up.