I don't take it as an insult since there isn't anything insulting in what your saying... I really could careless if you or anybody clicks on those links... I just posted it for those in doubt or for those showing interest on the topic at hand.Blue_turnip wrote:Not throwing an insult at you but IMHO theres a fine line between stating something thats backed up by evidence and filling a post with blue underlined text that noone's going to click on. Unless people actually ask you to 'give evidence' or whatever, its pretty much useless.Wu_ wrote:I agree with Ben ... Jeremy does do his thing the right way ... but without a real source link or something along that line we can only take his word for it that what he is saying is true.
here is a link stating that alcohol is worse than xtc brought to us by a british newspaper... but as always media can twist things around so you can never be quite sure unless you do serious research on this topic.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/ma ... hol123.xml
another little article from ezines where the author is stating that sugar addiction is comparable with smoking, alcohol or even gambling. Again I wouldn't be too sure.. since these are always people from some kind of magazine talking on these topics
http://ezinearticles.com/?Control-Your- ... &id=299012
...
not tryin to really prove a point.. just some sources thrown out there
I lolled hard at Ken's post about cutting up footbags.
If somebody were to actually ask for evidence he could google it his damn self if you ask me. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to google.
I do think it is nice though if somebody states something specific like.. Alcohol is more dangerous than XTC for this or that reason and than has a good source to show that your actually doing research on this topic and not just talking out of your ass (and that is no attack to anybody at all).
Drugs in footbags... too bad we let the cat out of the bag. would of been a sweet way to sell some weed ..matter of fact.. it still is! ..drugs in lavers?