Post
by Dohovenus » 26 Jan 2003 21:11
Tolkien was a brilliant man. He was linguistically gifted, and besides LoTR, he did much useful work as a philologist. Little preface there.
It seems that no one has learned from the example of Bakshi and whoever made the Hobbit movie--LoTR cannot be portrayed visually. The best non-textual rendition of LoTR is in a radio play, and even the radio plays (Minds Eye, BBC) do not hold up with the actual work, and diminish much of Tolkien's genius.
Peter Jackson's FoTR and TTT, besides the gross inaccuracies with respect to the storyline, ridiculed Tolkien with melodrama and cheap romances. Jackson took Tolkien's epic work and reduced it into something that large crowds can digest and make out to (heh, nothing intended, FootbagginBum). The lack of a better rendition (I think that an animated version would be the best) does not make Jackson's a good one. The special effects and costumes are intriguing, but the score, directing, acting, and screenplay suggest that the film should be retitled, "Die Hard 12: Mordor Madness," starring Jean Claude van Damme as Aragorn, Sylvester Stallone as Boromir, and Arnold Schwartzeneger as Sauron.
I realize that this sounds about as high-minded and arrogant as possible, but I'm just a man whose circumstances are beyond his control... I like Tolkien.
Oh, yeah, Jeremy--calling someone a fascist and throwing around the term "Fourth Reich" in an online forum on a thread about LoTR is just idiotic. That's my use of free speech.
Regards,
Vadim.