X-Dex
- FootbagginBum
- Flower Child
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: 03 Jan 2003 00:58
- Location: Grass Valley and Las Vegas
- Contact:
- FootbagginBum
- Flower Child
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: 03 Jan 2003 00:58
- Location: Grass Valley and Las Vegas
- Contact:
-
ToeGuiltless
- Fearless
- Posts: 673
- Joined: 18 Aug 2002 16:47
matt, somehow i did know, you would like this silly idea 
"I´m not a player, I just play a lot!"
-Johannes Korff
--> http://www.george.bush.has-a-small-penis.com <--
-Johannes Korff
--> http://www.george.bush.has-a-small-penis.com <--
- QuantumBalance
- 100-Watt Warlock
- Posts: 5092
- Joined: 22 Apr 2002 14:24
- Location: fractal tyedye nebulae
- Contact:
- FootbagginBum
- Flower Child
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: 03 Jan 2003 00:58
- Location: Grass Valley and Las Vegas
- Contact:
Great
Great idea you got there toeguiltless...except for there is one problem, a montage is significantly harder than a butterfly...so therefore for a montage to be a 2 add would be ridiculous (though i know you're kidding anyway......i hope)
Anyway, i think xdex is a smart concept really.
Maybe xdex should be classified as at least 2 "360's" around the bag...a datw requires 2 "360s"...an atom smasher also requires 2 "360's" but with opposite feet...Does anyone agree? I'm not trying to change the definition of xdex, but i think this would be more clear...and i saw nothing wrong with the "axis" analogy posted at the beginning of the thread, but if sunil looked at someone like he were a moron, then i don't want to be a moron neither.
Give me your response
Anyway, i think xdex is a smart concept really.
Maybe xdex should be classified as at least 2 "360's" around the bag...a datw requires 2 "360s"...an atom smasher also requires 2 "360's" but with opposite feet...Does anyone agree? I'm not trying to change the definition of xdex, but i think this would be more clear...and i saw nothing wrong with the "axis" analogy posted at the beginning of the thread, but if sunil looked at someone like he were a moron, then i don't want to be a moron neither.
Give me your response
Chris May

Paradox=((5N^x^p)-54000aph^np)/adds
Its just about that confusing...

Paradox=((5N^x^p)-54000aph^np)/adds
Its just about that confusing...