X-Dex

Talk about your big add moves and concepts in here.

Do you think we should use x-dex in jobs and stuff?

Yes
36
58%
No
13
21%
No
13
21%
 
Total votes: 62

User avatar
Matt
Post Master General
Posts: 2826
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 14:07
Location: Iowa city
Contact:

Post by Matt » 26 Jan 2003 15:50

toe> (symp) op out> switch planted feet> (symp) op in> op toe

thats a 5 without xdex chan
Like every man of sense and good feeling, I abominate work
-Aldous Huxley

User avatar
FootbagginBum
Flower Child
Posts: 2018
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 00:58
Location: Grass Valley and Las Vegas
Contact:

Post by FootbagginBum » 26 Jan 2003 16:00

but atom smasher gets one, so isn't that 6?
"Be the change you wish to see in the world" - Gandhi

Muffinman
the gimp
Posts: 10378
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 15:34
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Muffinman » 26 Jan 2003 16:28

if pogo dont get symp flailing dont either.

User avatar
FootbagginBum
Flower Child
Posts: 2018
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 00:58
Location: Grass Valley and Las Vegas
Contact:

Post by FootbagginBum » 26 Jan 2003 16:33

what the hell are you talking about, flailing is 20 times harder than pogo, I could do a pogo mirage before a regula clip set one, and I can do 6 or 7 atomic tricks and can't flail at all, on the way up or down.
"Be the change you wish to see in the world" - Gandhi

ToeGuiltless
Fearless
Posts: 673
Joined: 18 Aug 2002 16:47

Post by ToeGuiltless » 26 Jan 2003 17:58

i think every move below 3 adds should get 1 add, and every move thats 3 or more adds, should get 2.

so we can keep the whole guiltless thing, but not worry about adds at the same time.

PS: this is a stupid idea.

User avatar
Matt
Post Master General
Posts: 2826
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 14:07
Location: Iowa city
Contact:

Post by Matt » 26 Jan 2003 19:51

o man thats a great idea
Like every man of sense and good feeling, I abominate work
-Aldous Huxley

User avatar
Dr. Jones
Multidex Master
Posts: 219
Joined: 16 Jun 2002 14:18
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Post by Dr. Jones » 27 Jan 2003 13:37

matt, somehow i did know, you would like this silly idea :roll:
"I´m not a player, I just play a lot!"
-Johannes Korff

--> http://www.george.bush.has-a-small-penis.com <--

User avatar
QuantumBalance
100-Watt Warlock
Posts: 5092
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 14:24
Location: fractal tyedye nebulae
Contact:

Post by QuantumBalance » 27 Jan 2003 16:19

or... people can keep adds and people like me and anyone else can not care about them

User avatar
FootbagginBum
Flower Child
Posts: 2018
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 00:58
Location: Grass Valley and Las Vegas
Contact:

Post by FootbagginBum » 27 Jan 2003 21:39

lol, yeah, I like that one, I'm gonna shred with you.
"Be the change you wish to see in the world" - Gandhi

User avatar
Shredster
Flower Child
Posts: 1532
Joined: 14 Nov 2003 00:19
Location: Medford, OR
Contact:

Great

Post by Shredster » 08 Dec 2003 21:01

Great idea you got there toeguiltless...except for there is one problem, a montage is significantly harder than a butterfly...so therefore for a montage to be a 2 add would be ridiculous (though i know you're kidding anyway......i hope)

Anyway, i think xdex is a smart concept really.

Maybe xdex should be classified as at least 2 "360's" around the bag...a datw requires 2 "360s"...an atom smasher also requires 2 "360's" but with opposite feet...Does anyone agree? I'm not trying to change the definition of xdex, but i think this would be more clear...and i saw nothing wrong with the "axis" analogy posted at the beginning of the thread, but if sunil looked at someone like he were a moron, then i don't want to be a moron neither.

Give me your response
Chris May
Image
Paradox=((5N^x^p)-54000aph^np)/adds
Its just about that confusing...

Post Reply