New Moves

Shredster · Post by **Shredster** » 25 May 2004 20:43

HOLY COW!!! Thats insane!! Barraging paradox barraging osis!

Slippur · Post by **Slippur** » 25 May 2004 21:11

Wow! that's so huge, I *must* have video!

clip>op in [dex]>same in [dex]>>op in [pdx] [dex]>same in[dex]>front spin[bod]>op clip [xbd] [del].. 4 dexes, paradox, spin, xbdy, delay. 8 adds.. HUGE

max · Post by **max** » 25 May 2004 23:54

you want huge?
get Champion's League. Wait I'll post a new topic..

ebo · Post by **ebo** » 26 May 2004 00:09

Vasek told me at Footjam he has hit swirling janiwalker and is working
on Alpine Nemesis right now

no new moves for me, my legs are still a bit sore from the footjam

King Monkey · Post by **King Monkey** » 26 May 2004 00:35

well that is just f***ing ridiculous!! that has got to be one of the hugest moves ever! heinous! there must be video of that surely... why has it only just been brought up!? arrrgghh i wish i was going to worlds!

Alpine Nemesis... i love when he says hes working on it... cos its only a matter of time

this kinda pales in significance but i hit Scorpions Tail today, barely missed the handcatch but i was given it by Dyalan, who incidently hit Matador and Sumo today with his new-found Nuclear set... cool cool

will there be a full tourney report of Footjam? i want all the goss

Anz · Post by **Anz** » 26 May 2004 01:15

OH HOLY S***, VASEK!!!! I'M FAINTING!!

Has anybody ever hit any Barraging Ducking stuff??

I propose that Vasek should get his own class in competitions. So that there would be Intermediate, Pro, and Vasek class...

- Anssi Sundberg

max · Post by **max** » 26 May 2004 01:42

I'm guessing there'll be a full write-up about the footjam. I havn't posted with all the insane stuff Vasek hit while at footjam because he didn't shred much actually. I did see him try barraging ducking. He's close. It would clip the back of his neck now and then. So I'm putting my money on the fact that he'll have it by next worlds.. It actually doesn't even look that hard when he does it!!

But honestly if you want sick footage order the Champion's League. Best footage to date (yes it does help living in Prague)

Shredster · Post by **Shredster** » 26 May 2004 06:55

If we want to include xdex into vaseks furious barroque, well...its a 9 add

Clip > op in [dex] > same in [dex] > op in [dex][pdx][xdex] > same in [dex] > (front spin) [bod] > op clip [xbd][del]

And for some reason, i think vasek will someday (or somebody) will hit furious symposium barroque...who knows! That'll be 10!

max · Post by **max** » 26 May 2004 07:39

doesn't the fourth dex get an xdex also?

ptaku · Post by **ptaku** » 26 May 2004 08:07

In this notation yes. But I think Shredster made mistake - the Spin to Barroque is a back Spin (after second Baroque dex a bag is on the oposite side to the dexing leg...

Shredster · Post by **Shredster** » 26 May 2004 15:38

"But I think Shredster made mistake - the Spin to Barroque is a back Spin (after second Baroque dex a bag is on the oposite side to the dexing leg..."

I'm pretty sure its front spin...think of barroque by itself, its front spin. The fact that furious is before the barroque does not mean you back spin.[/quote]

Muffinman · Post by **Muffinman** » 26 May 2004 16:43

confusing. i had never thought of torque as a frontspin before, i watched the hackrifice move demos and realize theyre wrong, now. i think furious barroque, however, would be backspinning because of the original clipper set. if you subtract all the dexterities from the move it is just an osis (ie: backspin). i dont see how this affects the xdex, though.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 26 May 2004 17:15

I think it's a frontspin - it should be based off the last component before the spin - rather than off the original set. For that reason I call neutron set atomic spinning or atomic gyro - but if it were based of the set it would be atomic inspin etc.

Furious Baroque is pretty damn hardcore. Personally I think it should only get one x dex and it's another excellent reason why nemesis shouldn't get an x dex since it definitely has more "dex" than nemesis. However if you give nemesis an x dex, logic would suggest that furious baroque would have to get two - it has three full dexes - second dex of barraging and both baroque dexes. - whatever - the amount of adds the move gets doesn't make it any more or less hardcore.

qphox · Post by **qphox** » 26 May 2004 19:54

Ummm...damn. Well, I hit pixie ss blender.

I was happy with myself...

sniikeri · Post by **sniikeri** » 27 May 2004 04:58

chan wrote:vasek hit furious barroque!!!!!!!

I don't know what to say.

Should I start crying or go back to practicing? (You don't have to answer to this...)

ptaku · Post by **ptaku** » 27 May 2004 06:13

Jeremy wrote:I think it's a frontspin - it should be based off the last component before the spin - rather than off the original set. For that reason I call neutron set atomic spinning or atomic gyro - but if it were based of the set it would be atomic inspin etc.

Furious Baroque is pretty damn hardcore. Personally I think it should only get one x dex and it's another excellent reason why nemesis shouldn't get an x dex since it definitely has more "dex" than nemesis. However if you give nemesis an x dex, logic would suggest that furious baroque would have to get two - it has three full dexes - second dex of barraging and both baroque dexes. - whatever - the amount of adds the move gets doesn't make it any more or less hardcore.

1. On Footbag.org Barroque is a backspin. I'm pretty sure it's correct - and it make sens for me.

2. Yes.. Furious Barroque have more dexterity than nemesis - and it's Paradox.

Air · Post by **Air** » 27 May 2004 10:18

chan wrote:vasek hit furious barroque!!!!!!!

Is that 10 adds!?
dex, dex, dex, pdx, xdex, dex, xdex, bod, xbd, del

Has Vasek hit Furious Flurry?

xndru · Post by **xndru** » 27 May 2004 11:12

I say it's an eight. it's a blurry torque with two extra dexes. XDEX blows when used improperly (IMO).

Tripp · Post by **Tripp** » 27 May 2004 12:00

AA wrote:
Has Vasek hit Furious Flurry?

'Twas what I was going to ask. If he can hit Furious Barroque, I'd say he could hit Furious Flurry just the same.

HackyRichard · Post by **HackyRichard** » 27 May 2004 15:32

vasek was trying barraging paradox barroque. saw karim daouk hit nemesis. vasek was trying some weird phasing stuff, but i couldn't figure out what he was trying. oh, i saw him hit swirling ripwalk.
i got to play with yves. he hit pdx tapping blender fist try ever. i was hitting some mid string 6's. locomotion and food processor. i don't know what else was hit, i was all over the place!
Andrew @ 05/25/04 04:34PM

unless trying means has hit ... no doubt he's probably nailed it since then

oh and here's how the jobs pan out:

clip>op in[DEX]>same in[DEX]>>op in[PDX][DEX][XDEX]>same in[DEX][XDEX]>back spin[BOD]>op clip[XBD][DEL]

Like Erik (and ptaku) said it is a back spin, think osis or pdx torque. Generic Torque is front spin because it is basically a far osis (clip>front spin>same clip), however toe set torque would also be a back spin.

Hmmm barrage 3, toe barrage 4, pdx barrage 5 ... balanced

, not like it matters, pdx barroque is sick!!