1. I've never seen any evidence that his opinion is any more accurate than anybody else's.
2. I can see for myself from the video that the trick is 'the.' It wouldn't matter which people said it was or wasn't - the evidence is conclusive.
I'd also point out that whether Vasek is awesome or not and whether he blows minds or not is completely irrelevant. As I said in the initial topic - it's a great routine, and I think the only person to deny that is Kyle Hewitt.
Instead of arguing that the whirr is clean based on the logical fallacy of an argumentum ad verecundium (argument from authority), why not review the video and tell me through a set of logical statements how it is clean? Also feel free to tell me what a 'the' whirl would look like, and the difference between his whirr and a 'the' one. I keep asking, and the only answer I got was an explanation that was the same as my explanation for the trick in question.