Who's hit 10 unique fearless?
- Outsider
- Ayatollah of Rock n' Rollah
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: 21 May 2003 21:30
- Location: Bridgewater, New Jersey
Yeah, I suppose there is a topic that could stand some debate. But I'm not here to debate it now. Just felt like saying that double spins are super cool, and whatever the ADD count of that move, its probably the coolest one in the string, so, yeah, big props.max wrote:I think it gets x-SPIN or something (like inspins?). I don't know for sure..grek wrote:Props to you Guys but isn't Double Spinning Clipper a 4?
ADDs Schmadds, double spin is fearless in spirit.
"The time has come to convert the unbelievers..."
Jonathan Schneider --- sometimes showers with his Lavers on (to clean them)
The Ministry of Silly Walks
NYFA
BAP
Jonathan Schneider --- sometimes showers with his Lavers on (to clean them)
The Ministry of Silly Walks
NYFA
BAP
- Will Digges
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1382
- Joined: 15 Nov 2004 19:40
- Location: USA, Ballston Lake, NY
- Contact:
Why is pdx whirl free fearless always brought up? Who cares?
Jon's FootBlog
MSN: jon.haber@gmail.com
"It was clean enough to be thin..." - Andrew W.
MSN: jon.haber@gmail.com
"It was clean enough to be thin..." - Andrew W.
If you were able to play fearless or beastly, you would know from personal experience that PWF fearless/tripless/beastly is much easier than the alternative. What percentage of beast combos are made up of pdx-whirl based 6s? What about 10 strings of fearless?
I've hit several beastly links (but never a beast), and I can say from personal experience, that PWF beastly links are much harder. Same for fearless play. Since I personally am interested in hard links, I am interested in PWF fearless. That's why I care.
I personally challenge you, Jon Haber, to hit 5 unique fearless of your choice. Alternately, I challenge you to hit 2 beastly of your choice. Once you manage either of these, go out and see how much harder it is to do either of these challenges without using pdx whirl components. Please post here when you are done, and let me know your findings.
I've hit several beastly links (but never a beast), and I can say from personal experience, that PWF beastly links are much harder. Same for fearless play. Since I personally am interested in hard links, I am interested in PWF fearless. That's why I care.
I personally challenge you, Jon Haber, to hit 5 unique fearless of your choice. Alternately, I challenge you to hit 2 beastly of your choice. Once you manage either of these, go out and see how much harder it is to do either of these challenges without using pdx whirl components. Please post here when you are done, and let me know your findings.
You miss my point. The topic is about hitting fearless. Its about hitting strings comprised of 5 add moves. It is not relevant how difficult those five add moves are. Therefore bringing up difficulty is best left for other threads, where this topic has been rehashed over and over again. By bringing it up again you will not change the fact that pdx whirl moves do count as fearless links.
Jon's FootBlog
MSN: jon.haber@gmail.com
"It was clean enough to be thin..." - Andrew W.
MSN: jon.haber@gmail.com
"It was clean enough to be thin..." - Andrew W.
- shreddaily
- Flower Child
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: 03 Sep 2003 16:56
I haven't hit 10 fearless yet...the head count is 16... people who posted here or have been posted for.
IMO trick difficulty is relative and not universal. Thats why we have adds and not points. Stop throwing whirls, they'll get hard again
(that being said a PWF beast does almost sound impossible... though the last few times anyone has said they have never seen a trick/link, a good search threw the Joulukalender usually prooves them wrong, I think I'll go do that.)
IMO trick difficulty is relative and not universal. Thats why we have adds and not points. Stop throwing whirls, they'll get hard again
(that being said a PWF beast does almost sound impossible... though the last few times anyone has said they have never seen a trick/link, a good search threw the Joulukalender usually prooves them wrong, I think I'll go do that.)