New Moves
-
KronoKicker
- Atomsmashasaurus Dex
- Posts: 750
- Joined: 27 Apr 2004 10:39
- Location: Morrisville, NC
That was some crazy barefoot shred kevin.. major props..
new stuff from today:
nuclear same mirage
frontside blur
frontside tripwalk (is wonton 2 add set or 1 add set?)
backside blur (finally a 5 from my strong clipper)
gyro clipper both sides
nasty tomahawk... planted after the set, then hit the bag 2 times during the dex.. still managed to delay it though.. more skooling is needed.
pixie diving mirage
footed flipside assassin
new stuff from today:
nuclear same mirage
frontside blur
frontside tripwalk (is wonton 2 add set or 1 add set?)
backside blur (finally a 5 from my strong clipper)
gyro clipper both sides
nasty tomahawk... planted after the set, then hit the bag 2 times during the dex.. still managed to delay it though.. more skooling is needed.
pixie diving mirage
footed flipside assassin
Aric McIntosh
-
brian relly
- fan-tas-tic
- Posts: 2711
- Joined: 31 Aug 2003 10:03
- Location: 303
It tatw gets xdex why shouldn't tod?AA wrote:Yep, it's very hard and cool move and I think it should not get x-dex.Shredster wrote:Unless you consider tod to get an xdex, which i don't feel should get one. Not to say that it isn't a super hard cool move. Props!AA wrote: Double Down is four adds. So Triple Down is five adds, not six.
esteban barnez
myspace.com/rawcakes
myspace.com/rawcakes
david wrote:I was just sitting here surfing and my mom looks over my shoulder. I had to jab down the down key real quick so she wouldn't see that topic title and question me about what kind of site I was going on.
Well, technically, tatw should get xdex either.Stephen Barnes wrote:It tatw gets xdex why shouldn't tod?AA wrote:Yep, it's very hard and cool move and I think it should not get x-dex.Shredster wrote: Unless you consider tod to get an xdex, which i don't feel should get one. Not to say that it isn't a super hard cool move. Props!
Chris May

Paradox=((5N^x^p)-54000aph^np)/adds
Its just about that confusing...

Paradox=((5N^x^p)-54000aph^np)/adds
Its just about that confusing...
yeah, could somebody clarify this? I`m under the impression that tatw doesn`t technically get x-dex, but when x-dex was proposed, wasn`t one of the explanations of why x-dex was needed was that adding extra full dexes exponentially increases difficulty, and then tatw vs datw was given as an example?Shredster wrote:Well, technically, tatw should get xdex either.Stephen Barnes wrote:It tatw gets xdex why shouldn't tod?AA wrote: Yep, it's very hard and cool move and I think it should not get x-dex.
OK, I admit I just responded because I think the multiple quote boxes looks cool.
- mosher
- brutal footbag cronie
- Posts: 6177
- Joined: 22 Jan 2004 23:30
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Contact:
Can everyone PLEASE cut out the quoting?C-Fan wrote:yeah, could somebody clarify this? I`m under the impression that tatw doesn`t technically get x-dex, but when x-dex was proposed, wasn`t one of the explanations of why x-dex was needed was that adding extra full dexes exponentially increases difficulty, and then tatw vs datw was given as an example?Shredster wrote:Well, technically, tatw should get xdex either.Stephen Barnes wrote: It tatw gets xdex why shouldn't tod?
OK, I admit I just responded because I think the multiple quote boxes looks cool.
It is getting out of hand.
Tom Mosher
hate is a waste of passion!
hate is a waste of passion!
-
KronoKicker
- Atomsmashasaurus Dex
- Posts: 750
- Joined: 27 Apr 2004 10:39
- Location: Morrisville, NC
