O Really

Tsiangkun · Post by **Tsiangkun** » 14 Oct 2004 08:58

Bill, of fox news fame, O'reilly is facing a sexual harassment lawsuit.

the smoking gun .com has the story , the court filings, and more HERE

A real page turner

Bye Bye Bill

carl winslow · Post by **carl winslow** » 14 Oct 2004 10:54

haha nice, the same dude that killed clinton over the lewinsky thing is an alleged perv himself

HighDemonslayer · Post by **HighDemonslayer** » 14 Oct 2004 11:08

If O'reilly gets fired he can go work for Limbaugh's drug cartel.

-n

FlexThis · Post by **FlexThis** » 14 Oct 2004 14:02

That's ok O'Reilly can go, he has been flip flopping on his Bush praise recently, saying "Although I like the guy, he has problems." This to me is O'Reilly giving excuses for switching parties. Hence the sudden sexual harasment suit, aka just following in ole Clinton's footsteps.

Sorry I could resist.

C-Fan · Post by **C-Fan** » 14 Oct 2004 23:03

This is nothing new really. So many prominent Republicans who have taken the moral high ground have eventually been humiliated by being incredible hypocrites. Newt Gingrich, who pilloried Clinton, cheated on his 2nd wife with his secretary, whom he eventually married. Or Rush and pills. Or that guy with the gambling addiction. Too lazy to look it up.

But I have to say I really appreciated the part where O`Reilly said he`d rub a falafel against the girl`s clitoris. That`s just priceless.

Tsiangkun · Post by **Tsiangkun** » 15 Oct 2004 08:36

Yeah, one minute he is about the loofa, and then WHAM! out of nowhere he is getting kinky with a falafel . . . makes the Clinton/Lewinsky/Cigar thing seem high class and sophisticated.

RRW13 · Post by **RRW13** » 15 Oct 2004 20:43

yeah i heard about the Bill o'reily law suit. I heard that the women wants 60 million dollars to keep quite. also on his talk radio show he was saying something like the media is attacking him from every side and Bill clinton was in the similar situation and they didnt really do nothing to attack him.

Tsiangkun · Post by **Tsiangkun** » 16 Oct 2004 08:24

of course, anyone who remembers will notice a big difference.

Clinton wasn't about unwanted sexual advances. He got a blow job from his intern, and she was cool with it. The media turned it into a big deal and went into his private life because he denied it. Clinton didn't break any laws . . . bill Oreilly on the other hand was harrassing a co worker, against her wishes, who apparently has lots of audio tape of what was said, detailed notes on when he said it, and detailed notes on the fox corporate response to her complaints about him.

It's against the law to make unwanted sexual advances in the workplace. He broke the law, and he deserves the media attention we gave Kobe.