Two Pdx adds in one trick?

Talk about your big add moves and concepts in here.

Well, is it possible?!?!?!

Yes.
17
44%
I'm leaning towards yes, but...
3
8%
It's hard to say. It depends on the trick and set.
4
10%
I don't think so.
2
5%
No.
10
26%
I'm apathetic
3
8%
 
Total votes: 39

User avatar
qphox
Bullshit Detector
Posts: 2894
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 07:20
Location: Vancouver, BC

Post by qphox »

90 in the set, I guess.
180 in the spin, MAYBE 270.
Another 90 in the dex? Maybe?

Yeah sorry Jeremy I don't see the 720 you're talking about.
- Kevin R.

F = G*((m1*m2)/r^2)

Know thy enemy.
ptaku
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1099
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 11:49
Location: Poland, Kolobrzeg
Contact:

Post by ptaku »

Jeremy - I see 540 degres in Nuclear Inspinning Pdx Mirage... But.. Maybe I see wrong... I always thought that the bag must pass twice behind, and twice in front of you... Behind - in front - behind - in front, or in front of - behind - in front of - behind ... Hmm maybe you see that with the nuclear set the bag passes first in front of you - from one to the other site, then is direction change, ande the bag pass in front - behind - in front? So the bag pass generall 4 times - in front of - in front of - behind - in front of? I don't think that this can be considered as two full spins. Maybe I'm wrong.


Bob - I didn't know that EVERY Inspinning move is x-spin... I think that I have read two versions of Eric's definition - in each one of them there was nothing that every Inspin is an x-spin... There was info only about two full spins... And according to what I have read Spinning Clipper and Inspinning Clipper both aren't x-spin move (and this is the truth for me), and Inspinning Osis is x-spin move, but Spinning Osis isn't a one. Now I'm totally questionable about this things - I felt very sure about them..
Pawel Ptaszynski

"I know I can! Be what I wanna be.
If I work hard at it, I'll be where I wanna be."

NAS

Be strong, LIVESTRONG

http://www.laf.org
http://www.wearyellow.com
User avatar
Cod
Flower Child
Posts: 2280
Joined: 26 Dec 2003 16:37
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Post by Cod »

I tought a lot about Inspins and now I see in Nuclear Inspinning Pdx Mirage 540 degrees :). But where are missing 180? (I agree that there are 720 degrees and one X-spin in Nuclear Inspinning Pdx Torque)

What a beautifull off-topic ;).
Michał Biarda (Me-how Be-r-da)
User avatar
bob
Le Meurtre Faux
Posts: 518
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 12:55
Location: parkersburg, west virginia

Post by bob »

not every inspin move is xspin. only inspinning far concepts. ingyro (or some call inspyro) do not get xspin.
Bob Glasser
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

lol - ok I just can't add up. 540 is what I should have said.

runs and hides in a corner :oops:
ptaku
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1099
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 11:49
Location: Poland, Kolobrzeg
Contact:

Post by ptaku »

bob wrote:not every inspin move is xspin. only inspinning far concepts. ingyro (or some call inspyro) do not get xspin.
Hmm... Can somebody (Maybe Brad K? Chris?) confirm that? Honestly... I don't belive it... And this is... hmm... nonsnsen for mebecause I don't see so big difrence in difficult to make them x-spin...
Pawel Ptaszynski

"I know I can! Be what I wanna be.
If I work hard at it, I'll be where I wanna be."

NAS

Be strong, LIVESTRONG

http://www.laf.org
http://www.wearyellow.com
User avatar
bob
Le Meurtre Faux
Posts: 518
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 12:55
Location: parkersburg, west virginia

Post by bob »

you do'nt think that inspinnig clipper is harder than spinning clipper? and inspinning osis harder than spinning osis? inspinning whirl and spinning whirl? have you tried these moves? there is obviously another degree of difficulty.

bob
Bob Glasser
Post Reply