Nuclear States

This section is specifically for serious non-footbag debate and discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Tsiangkun
Post Master General
Posts: 2855
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 02:27
Location: Oaktown

Nuclear States

Post by Tsiangkun »

Even though Bush and his crack team of advisors working 110% to secure the world from terror and corrupt regimes, somehow N. Korea has made good on their plans to develop a nuclear weapon. Bush stated with glee and pride several years ago, "We don't negotiate with terrorist", and this is where his methodology has gotten us. Now we have a new nuclear power on the planet due in part to one administration unwillingness to embrace the reality based community and join the world in rational discussions of global politics.

Well done, I feel so much safer than I did before they blew a trillion dollars on Iraq.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following text is the full statement released on Thursday by North Korea's KCNA news agency. North Korea refers to itself as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK).
Pyongyang, February 10 (KCNA) - The DPRK Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a statement Thursday to clarify its stand to cope with the grave situation created by the US hostile policy toward the DPRK.

The statement says:

The second-term Bush administration's intention to antagonize the DPRK and isolate and stifle it at any cost has become quite clear.

As we have clarified more than once, we justly urged the US to renounce its hostile policy toward the DPRK whose aim was to seek the latter's "regime change" and switch its policy to that of peaceful co-existence between the two countries. We have closely followed with patience what policy the second-term Bush regime would shape after clarifying the stand that in that case it would be possible to solve the nuclear issue, too.

However, the administration turned down our just request and adopted it as its policy not to co-exist with the DPRK through the president's inaugural address and the state of the union address and the speech made by the secretary of State at the Congress hearing to get its approval, etc.

The remarks made by senior officials of the administration clarifying the official political stance of the US contained no word showing any willingness to co-exist with the DPRK or make a switchover in its policy toward it.

On the contrary, they have declared it as their final goal to terminate the tyranny, defined the DPRK, too, as an "outpost of tyranny" and blustered that they would not rule out the use of force when necessary.

And they pledged to build a world based on the US view on value through the "spread of American style liberty and democracy."

The true intention of the second-term Bush administration is not only to further its policy to isolate and stifle the DPRK pursued by the first-term office but to escalate it. As seen above, the US has declared a new ideological stand-off aimed at a "regime change" in the DPRK while talking much about "peaceful and diplomatic solution" to the nuclear issue and the "resumption of the six-party talks" in a bid to mislead the world public opinion.

This is nothing but a far-fetched logic of gangsters as it is a good example fully revealing the wicked nature and brazen-faced double-dealing tactics of the U.S. as a master hand at plot-breeding and deception.

The DPRK has clarified its stand that it would not pursue anti-Americanism and treat the US as a friendly nation if it neither slanders the political system in the DPRK nor interferes in its internal affairs. It has since made every possible effort to settle the nuclear issue and improve the bilateral relations.

However, the US interpreted this as a sign of weakness, defiled the dignified political system in the DPRK chosen by its people and wantonly interfered in its internal affairs. The US, turning down the DPRK's request to roll back its anti-DPRK hostile policy, a major stumbling block in the way of settling the nuclear issue, treated it as an enemy and, not content with this, totally rejected it, terming it "tyranny." This deprived the DPRK of any justification to negotiate with the U.S. and participate in the six-party talks.

Is it not self-contradictory and unreasonable for the US to urge the DPRK to come out to the talks while negating its dialogue partner? This is the height of impudence.

The US now foolishly claims to stand by the people in the DPRK while negating the government chosen by the people themselves. We advise the US to negotiate with dealers in peasant markets it claims they are to its liking or with representatives of "the organization of north Korean defectors" on its payroll if it wishes to hold talks.

Japan is now persistently pursuing its hostile policy toward the DPRK, toeing the US line.

Moreover, it fabricated the issue of false remains over the "abduction issue" that had already been settled in a bid to nullify the DPRK-Japan Pyongyang Declaration and stop any process to normalize diplomatic relations with the DPRK. How can we sit at the negotiating table with such a party?

It is the trend of the new century and wish of humankind to go in for peace, co-existence and prosperity irrespective of differing ideology, system and religious belief.

It is by no means fortuitous that the world people raise their voices cursing and censuring the Bush administration as a group pursuing tyranny prompted by its extreme misanthropy, swimming against such trend of the world.

We have shown utmost magnanimity and patience for the past four years since the first Bush administration swore in.

We can not spend another four years as we did in the past four years and there is no need for us to repeat what we did in those years.

The DPRK Foreign Ministry clarifies as following to cope with the grave situation created by the US hostile policy toward the DPRK:

First. We have wanted the six-party talks but we are compelled to suspend our participation in the talks for an indefinite period till we have recognized that there is justification for us to attend the talks and there are ample conditions and atmosphere to expect positive results from the talks.

The present deadlock of the six-party talks is attributable to the US hostile policy toward the DPRK.

There is no justification for us to participate in the six-party talks again given that the Bush administration termed the DPRK, a dialogue partner, an "outpost of tyranny", putting into the shade the hostile policy, and totally negated it.

Second. The US disclosed its attempt to topple the political system in the DPRK at any cost, threatening it with a nuclear stick. This compels us to take a measure to bolster its nuclear weapons arsenal in order to protect the ideology, system, freedom and democracy chosen by its people.

It is the spirit of the Korean people true to the Songun politics to respond to good faith and the use of force in kind.

We had already taken the resolute action of pulling out of the NPT and have manufactured nukes for self-defence to cope with the Bush administration's evermore undisguised policy to isolate and stifle the DPRK.

Its nuclear weapons will remain nuclear deterrent for self-defence under any circumstances.

The present reality proves that only powerful strength can protect justice and truth.

The US evermore reckless moves and attempt to attack the DPRK only reinforce its pride of having already consolidated the single-minded unity of the army and people and increased the capability for self-defence under the uplifted banner of Songun. The DPRK's principled stand to solve the issue through dialogue and negotiations and its ultimate goal to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula remain unchanged.
User avatar
DoctorJay
Fearless
Posts: 540
Joined: 20 Sep 2002 05:46
Location: bielefeld/germany
Contact:

Post by DoctorJay »

I am understanding N. Korean government , I ask me when other countries will build nuclear weapons too ...

The USA is a thread to every Islamic country or to any country which pissed bush off .

mdw were not enough to keep the army from their revolution of worldwide freedom- so maybe nuclear weapons are a better insurance - the clue about this situation is that these weapons are real !

If I would run a country I won't trust in a guy like bush too, so what should I do apart from building a nuclear weapon to deter him invading my country.

Bush's incalculability will support the production of nuclear weapons like fire.

We are not in the cold war - the non bush world try to quench bush - for me comprehensible.
Jochen Bauer

Paradox Feet Footbag Club
http://www.paradoxfeet.de

Website:
http://www.jochen-bauer.net
User avatar
lightningbolt
Nothing Vulgar
Posts: 983
Joined: 28 Jun 2004 12:55
Location: Alaska

Post by lightningbolt »

Maybe I just too immautre to get it but why can we have a crap load of nukes and any other country can't? It just doesn't make any sense to me. Yes, some leaders are cruel but Bush is much differnt from them in my eyes.

Also, the US is the only nation that used a nuclear bomb. Was it for a good cause? I don't have a anwer to that question by the way. Some say it was the only way to stop Japan. I just don't know.

I don't blame North Korea. The USA is becoming more and more aggesive and I don't blame them for trying to defend themselves.

This coming from the person who lives in a state the bomb could reach. :roll:
I think I going to take over Canada. You should help.
Get Firefox!
User avatar
Tsiangkun
Post Master General
Posts: 2855
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 02:27
Location: Oaktown

Post by Tsiangkun »

I agree with that. [/i]
User avatar
HighDemonslayer
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 19:34
Location: Arizona

Post by HighDemonslayer »

I saw a map of the ranges of different Korean missles, i think they can reach most or all of the U.S. already.

-n
Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?


-----------------------------------
-nathan
User avatar
DoctorJay
Fearless
Posts: 540
Joined: 20 Sep 2002 05:46
Location: bielefeld/germany
Contact:

Post by DoctorJay »

That is not that bad because there are lots of people in the US who are not interested in a bomb which cannot reach their own house, maybe.

It would be interesting to have a counter part to Bush and the US, who act in the same political way- I guess I wouldn't be able to write these lines because our planet woud be destroyed !!!

Since Bush is president I do not feel as safety as before- that is a sad situation which must be announced and hopefully everbody wondered what is the reason for such a feeling?
Jochen Bauer

Paradox Feet Footbag Club
http://www.paradoxfeet.de

Website:
http://www.jochen-bauer.net
BainbridgeShred
Post Master General
Posts: 2352
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 23:22

Post by BainbridgeShred »

"We don't negotiate with terrorist"
If there is one major flaw with US international policy, it's the quote above. Not negotiating with the people who, in many cases, posess the capibility to kill us is literally childish and moronic. The Bush Administration along with the greedy mainstream media has pushed an image of Al Qaeda as a group planning on fighting against the US until the end, not caring for any reasonable negotiations. This is bullshit; Osama bin Laden is not the kind of person who will fanatically fight till the death for no legitimate end, he would be willing to neogtiate, and would be seen as a hero of his people if he were able to strike a actual legitimate deal with the US.

Of course the US will never negotiate with Osama because doing so would entail taking a look at the inconsistancies of US policy both economically and politically. And seeing as it is big business who runs both the economy and the politics, we're forever doomed to under the scope of terrorists from Tunisia to North Korea.


Disclaimer: I'm not in the best state of mind right now, I'm deathly sick and am working on only a few hours of sleep, if some of the points in the post above don't make sense, please forgive me as I'm really out of it.
Image
Post Reply