"Safe Haven"

This section is specifically for serious non-footbag debate and discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
slapdash21
Futureless
Posts: 4681
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 14:50
Location: Beantown, kidd

"Safe Haven"

Post by slapdash21 »

"Safe Haven" laws. Good idea? Bad idea?

personally, i think its a fine idea. providing an anonymous, easy alternative to killing the baby and leaving it in an airport bathroom. the only negative is with this method being so easy, its possible more babies will be abandoned. but at least i think less will be killed/abandoned in bathrooms and dumpsters. also someone attempted to abandon her child when it was too old (the limit is something like 7 days after birth, i think, correct me if im wrong) and her child was like a month old, so then they have a problem. but overall, i think its a good alternative. opinions?
Pete Bowler
B$C
keeps it offah da ground.

617 FOR LIFE
User avatar
Tsiangkun
Post Master General
Posts: 2855
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 02:27
Location: Oaktown

Post by Tsiangkun »

I highly doubt more babies will be abandoned.

I don't think that is a decision many mothers would make lightly, or more frequently because of the option.
User avatar
slapdash21
Futureless
Posts: 4681
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 14:50
Location: Beantown, kidd

Post by slapdash21 »

i dunno. i picture some mothers who keep their child only because killing it is far too extreme and adoption is a big, extremely embaressing hassle. now they dont have to deal with either one. i dont think the number of abandoned children with rise dramatically, but its possible that it will rise marginally.
Pete Bowler
B$C
keeps it offah da ground.

617 FOR LIFE
Post Reply