x-dex tutorial

General footbag-related topics that don't fit elsewhere go in here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

x-dex tutorial

Post by Jeremy »

I just wrote an x dex tutorial for the freestyle section of footbag.org. Here it is. Please tell me what you think and any improvements you think I can add to it (also any spelling or grammatical errors ;) )


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is X-Dex?

“X-dex” is a concept created by Eric Wulff in an attempt to make the add system more accurate. An x-dex is an add given to moves with dexes that require more of the legs to go around the bag than other moves – something which before the introduction of x-dex wasn’t recognised by the add system.

With the improvement of freestyle footbag a better understanding of dexes has led to people realising that even though a particular move involves only going around the bag once or twice – there are different degrees to which you can go around the bag. These differences are often referred to as “half dexes” and “full dexes.”

A good example of a each is clipper set mirage and paradox mirage. A mirage from a clipper set – clip>op in>op toe involves the bag going behind the dexing leg before being stalled. A paradox mirage involves the bag going in front of the dexing leg, then behind before finishing on the toe. As you can see – even though both moves only involve one dex, the player has to do more to get that dex with a paradox mirage than with a non paradox mirage.

According to the rules of x-dex any move that has two full dexes gets an extra add to represent this increase in components. These components, like paradox, are much harder to see in a move than a dex add or a bod add. However when you compare a move such as tap – toe>op out>same in>op toe – to atomsmasher – toe>op out>op in>op toe – it’s fairly clear that more is required of a player to hit atomsmasher than to hit tap.

The following is a list of the sets and downtime components that are considered full dexes because the bag passes both in front and behind of the dexing leg. There are always new moves being invented so I haven’t included every example – however keeping in mind that a move requires two full dexes to receive an x-dex you should be able to work out which moves get it and which do not.

Sets:

Atomic (toe>op out>op component)
Quantum (toe>op in>op component)
Nuclear (clip>same out>op component)
Quasi (clip>same in>op component)
Shooting (clip>same in>op out>op component)

Components:
Mirage (…>op in>op toe)
Symposium Mirage (…>(no plant while) op in>op toe)
Illusion (…>op out>op toe)
Symposium Illusion (…>(no plant while) op out>op toe)
Drifter (…>op in>same clip)
Grifter (…>op out>same clip)
Torque (…>op in>spin (back)>op clip)
Double Leg Over (…op in>op out>op toe)
Eggbeater (… op out>op out>op toe)
Whirl (… op in>op clip)

Downtime beta symposium toe blur and similar moves (ie. Voodoo) also receive an x dex – toe>op in>(no plant while)>op in>op toe. Since they have two full dexes on the way down.

Moves receive one x dex add for every full dex after the first one. So for example if somebody were to hit a levitating toe blur – toe>(no plant while) op in>op in>op in>(no plant while) op in>op toe – it would receive three x-dex adds – bod, dex, xdex, dex, xdex, dex, xdex, bod, dex, xdex, del. Of course an 11 add move would be very difficult.
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

Hey Thanks everybody for your comments :P

Actually this has turned out to be a lot more involved than I thought. Not in writing the tutorial but in being involved with the IFPA and trying to push the sport forward and at this stage this whole tutorial is probably pretty useless - although I do think it explains x dex well (although I didn't mention any of the controversial issues involved with it).
User avatar
BalinorNZ
Post Master General
Posts: 2766
Joined: 26 Jul 2003 03:24
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand

Post by BalinorNZ »

Man thanks heaps for that Jeremy! I have been hoping for a while now someone would clear this issue up. This is very handy :D
User avatar
qphox
Bullshit Detector
Posts: 2894
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 07:20
Location: Vancouver, BC

Post by qphox »

So for example if somebody were to hit a levitating toe blur – toe>(no plant while) op in>op in>op in>(no plant while) op in>op toe – it would receive three x-dex adds.
Actually, the trick you described is Floating Merlin.

Good tutorial.
- Kevin R.

F = G*((m1*m2)/r^2)

Know thy enemy.
User avatar
FootbagginBum
Flower Child
Posts: 2018
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 00:58
Location: Grass Valley and Las Vegas
Contact:

Post by FootbagginBum »

Nice man, very clear and concise, and ends the only debate about whether fairy gets it or not.

And as for the floating merlin (which, although I would describe it that way, could also be accurately called levitating original backside toe blur) what is that, a challenge to Jorden? If you just give me a few months...and let me finish learning frantic merlin ( 8) ), I'll bust that shit. I'm breaking 10 adds in my career for sure :-)

Peace, and thanks again for the cool document,
Bum
"Be the change you wish to see in the world" - Gandhi
Post Reply