Two new ideas!!! Well maybe just one...

Krim · Post by **Krim** » 11 Jul 2005 13:32

I've also hit double ducking clipper or butfly, like 2 years ago, but I don't think it's useful for your game and not even nice!! And also: it hurts your neck if it's forced or too fast!! Anyway..

Sporatical_Distractions · Post by **Sporatical_Distractions** » 11 Jul 2005 14:24

i've done something kind of like a [rev]. a back stall to doing an atw with your upper torso and back to the back stall

Genzu · Post by **Genzu** » 11 Jul 2005 15:16

HenryG wrote:He is joking Ben. Double ducking clipper is very very hard and i have only heard of Sam Colclough hitting it. Triple ducking is absolutely impossible.

Rippin used to bust double ducking, though it didn't look anything like Sam's.

Also, I'm nearly totally lost on this whole [rev] thing... I'd second the request for video... Unless everyone just want's to laugh at me cause this is a joke?

Peace.

FlexThis · Post by **FlexThis** » 11 Jul 2005 16:00

Genzu · Post by **Genzu** » 11 Jul 2005 16:11

FlexThis wrote:Once again closed minds = nothing new to explore.

Huh?

-----
Edit: What are you trying to say exactly here? I don't want to assume anythign, which is why I only wrote "Huh"...

Peace.

pill · Post by **pill** » 11 Jul 2005 19:03

i understand what you're saying and i think it'd be covered in the bod add, but i'm not sure because i don't know as much as some about the add system. for those of you who don't understand i think what he's saying is setting the bag up and moving your body around it while staying facing forward like a hoola hoop motion(lots of hip/mid body moving). and the second variation would be like a spin but stay facing it the whole time so you'd have to actually move around the bag. i have either cleared it up for somebody, made it more confusing, or just repeated what everybody else said

(nobody uses this smiley)

FlexThis · Post by **FlexThis** » 12 Jul 2005 07:13

Exactly! That summed it up perfectly.

Daryl,

Nothing is directed at you bro, I promise. That argument is in another thread. You were honest about your impression of the move, and therefore actually participated in the thread. These comments are closed minded and off topic:

Janiwalker?

Damnit I wanted to use that next.

no. Janiwalker is a baroquing dyno.

I hit the triple ducking crab.

Thats a hard move ted. You should try doing the zebra set triple ducking crab. I bet you cant do it in less then 15 tries

Crab has to be set from outside.

The guy tried 3 times to explain it to you guys and you clowned him.

Sad.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 12 Jul 2005 07:21

Actually I was credited as being one of the people in the original footbagchat discussion about this (which isn't working for me anymore

- footbagchat I mean).

To be honest I think it's a pretty simple concept. Generally in footbag we use parts of our body to go around the bag - ie our legs or head. The idea of this concept is that our whole body goes around the footbag. It's a lot harder than it seemed when talking about it though.

bigdirtyfoot · Post by **bigdirtyfoot** » 12 Jul 2005 07:34

I don't think those comments make us seem closed minded at all. None of us ever said that we thought the [rev] add was stupid or anything. I just don't GET IT, that's all. I'd like to see it! I think that the topic just got off topic fast and we had a fun time with it, that's all.

Sheesh Damon. Wiggle? What a dumb name.

But anyways yeah, I think I understand the [rev] concept but I'd like to see it used.

Shredster · Post by **Shredster** » 12 Jul 2005 19:20

HenryG wrote:He is joking Ben. Double ducking clipper is very very hard and i have only heard of Sam Colclough hitting it. Triple ducking is absolutely impossible.

Is triple ducking really impossible?

HG · Post by HG » 13 Jul 2005 17:34