Add Category Terminology Clarification - HELP! :)
Add Category Terminology Clarification - HELP! :)
edit: OK FORGET THE POLL EVERYONE MAKE SUGGESTIONS AND WELL FIGURE IT OUT AND THEN IF NESC MAKE ANOTHER POLL LATER
ADDS
not hitting anything = trickless????
0+ = addless, effortless, limitless?? boundless?
1+ = trickless, effortless????
2+ = tiltless
3+ = guiltless
4+ = tripless
5+ = fearless
6+ = beastly
7+ = godly
I used to say trickless to mean 1+ adds but then I realized I was saying it to mean 0+ adds also.
I want names for 0+ and 1+ add shredding because I play like that a lot.
I'm feeling that trickless should be 0+ shouldnt it? because kicks are less of a trick than stalls.
0+ = trickless
1+ = ????
ADDS
not hitting anything = trickless????
0+ = addless, effortless, limitless?? boundless?
1+ = trickless, effortless????
2+ = tiltless
3+ = guiltless
4+ = tripless
5+ = fearless
6+ = beastly
7+ = godly
I used to say trickless to mean 1+ adds but then I realized I was saying it to mean 0+ adds also.
I want names for 0+ and 1+ add shredding because I play like that a lot.
I'm feeling that trickless should be 0+ shouldnt it? because kicks are less of a trick than stalls.
0+ = trickless
1+ = ????
Last edited by Samurai on 30 Aug 2005 13:32, edited 8 times in total.
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
Its a good idea but dropless already refers to going dropless in a run - can't confuse it.
Wong suggested n00bness which i think is really funny and i thought of listless - but i think the right one will sound great for sURE!
edit what about
0+: effortless
1+: trickless
??
Wong suggested n00bness which i think is really funny and i thought of listless - but i think the right one will sound great for sURE!
edit what about
0+: effortless
1+: trickless
??
Last edited by Samurai on 30 Aug 2005 12:53, edited 1 time in total.
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
- JFootbagger
- Fearless
- Posts: 534
- Joined: 29 Jan 2004 17:49
- Contact:
hahahaha "noobness"
effortless?
Edit: Okay, I guess Sam beat me too it
Posting that is
effortless?
Edit: Okay, I guess Sam beat me too it
Last edited by JFootbagger on 30 Aug 2005 12:54, edited 1 time in total.
Jordan Wong
basics=tricks=strings=people dropping their jaw in amazement
-Footblog! Check it out!
Enter My Mind
basics=tricks=strings=people dropping their jaw in amazement
-Footblog! Check it out!
Enter My Mind
nice we both thought of efforless at the same time -
well yeah i think effortless is good
I LOVE PLAYING EFFORTLESSSS!
well yeah i think effortless is good
I LOVE PLAYING EFFORTLESSSS!
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
- Paul Agostinelli
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: 23 Jan 2005 14:38
- Location: Rochester NY
0+ addless
1+ zipless, or nixless
0+ cant be trickless, i know a lot of tricks that get no adds because they involve body movements that get no adds.
for instance frigid kick, it doesnt xbd, uns, bod, dex, symp, no adds, tough trick.
~NEL~
1+ zipless, or nixless
0+ cant be trickless, i know a lot of tricks that get no adds because they involve body movements that get no adds.
for instance frigid kick, it doesnt xbd, uns, bod, dex, symp, no adds, tough trick.
~NEL~
Last edited by Paul Agostinelli on 30 Aug 2005 13:01, edited 1 time in total.
Precisely Mos Eisley
trickless sort of has to be in there because i dunno its been around for a while - addless is a decent suggestion - BUT EFFORTLESS OWNS YOU WOOOOO
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
- Will Digges
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1382
- Joined: 15 Nov 2004 19:40
- Location: USA, Ballston Lake, NY
paul u made a good point
um
0+ addless
1+ effortless?
if u cant hit ANYTHING trickless?
BAGLESS HAHA - AKA shadow hack
um
0+ addless
1+ effortless?
if u cant hit ANYTHING trickless?
BAGLESS HAHA - AKA shadow hack
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
dat said boundless
wooo this is fun
wooo this is fun
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
-
brian relly
- fan-tas-tic
- Posts: 2711
- Joined: 31 Aug 2003 10:03
- Location: 303
I think beastly and godly should be changed to something ending in "-less", to keep that flow.
esteban barnez
myspace.com/rawcakes
myspace.com/rawcakes
david wrote:I was just sitting here surfing and my mom looks over my shoulder. I had to jab down the down key real quick so she wouldn't see that topic title and question me about what kind of site I was going on.
- Sporatical_Distractions
- registered sacks offender
- Posts: 4529
- Joined: 12 Oct 2004 19:14
- Location: Guy's American Kitchen & Bar
i'm not too fond of the term trickless. There have been a couple circle kickers that I've kicked with that get kind of pissy when you do a couple tricks. footbag (not implying freestyle footbag
) is not just centered around tricks. trickless seems to imply that footbag is strictly about tricks which it is not.
[conflicting statement] but if you're looking at it from the "add" concept you are probably a freestyle footbagger and noticed that no tricks were performed [/end conflicting statement]
[conflicting statement] but if you're looking at it from the "add" concept you are probably a freestyle footbagger and noticed that no tricks were performed [/end conflicting statement]
Welcome to Flavortown
Kevin Crowley
Kevin Crowley
- Paul Agostinelli
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: 23 Jan 2005 14:38
- Location: Rochester NY
ill give u addless if you withdraw nixless and zipless - i dont like them 
howabout effortless?
limitless is cool too
howabout effortless?
limitless is cool too
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
- Paul Agostinelli
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: 23 Jan 2005 14:38
- Location: Rochester NY
ok so find another synonym for zero that sounds cool.
it should mean zeroless though
tiltless > no 1's (to tilt is to lose concentration)
guiltless > implies that a respectable shredder should feel guilty by going under this
tripless > "trip" 3... no 3's
fearless > "fear" 4... no 4's
beastly > comes from beast (6>6>6) combinations, 666 being the mark of the beast
godly > self explanitory.
~NEL~
it should mean zeroless though
tiltless > no 1's (to tilt is to lose concentration)
guiltless > implies that a respectable shredder should feel guilty by going under this
tripless > "trip" 3... no 3's
fearless > "fear" 4... no 4's
beastly > comes from beast (6>6>6) combinations, 666 being the mark of the beast
godly > self explanitory.
~NEL~
Precisely Mos Eisley
you didnt explain it AT ALL LOL
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.