Reverse Paradon? Non whirl dexes

HG · Post by HG » 06 Dec 2004 18:54

Has anyone hit reverse paradon, with non whirling dexes? I think to hit it you would essentially have to do 2.5 dexes to get your leg out of the way for the clipper.

toe>op in[DEX]>same in [DEX]>op clip[XBOD][DEL]

has anyone hit this? if so whats the name

this is not whirr, i have done it with an "air bag" and you can do it without whirling dexes.

Shredster · Post by **Shredster** » 06 Dec 2004 19:19

So if its not a toe whirr, would it be kind of like a toe barrage bail to opposite clipper?

That would be interesting. It'd be hard not to make any of the dexes whirlish...

Maraxus · Post by **Maraxus** » 06 Dec 2004 19:32

Eli and Jonny have been playing with hippy dex whirls or so I read. I bet one of them could hit it with a no plant quantum ss hippy whirl. That would really be sweet.

HG · Post by HG » 06 Dec 2004 19:35

no whirl dexes, and its all one motion, just like a paradon is. So its just the same as paradon, same dex style and motion just backwards...

james · Post by **james** » 06 Dec 2004 19:57

reverse paradon

qphox · Post by **qphox** » 06 Dec 2004 20:29

I've done some thought on this, and the motions make a little more sense to me...but I'm still pretty sure that you couldn't do that all downtime.

comastalker · Post by **comastalker** » 06 Dec 2004 23:56

I do my whirls like my paradons...
you don't want to tell me I'm doing pdx reverse whirrs all the time.

when do you think a whirl seperates itself from leggy miraging ? (afaik whirling IS leggy miraging, the same way paradons are leggy reverse mirages (aka illusioning). Just because you tend to do whirls more far away from your body or in a strange angle, they do not become something different than leggy miraging ss clips)

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 07 Dec 2004 03:27

considering about 99% of all clean toe barrages I've seen have started with a whirl like dex - I think it would be impossible to hit clean and downtime. Quantum muted miraging ss clipper might be possible but I still think the last dex would be "the"

Muffinman · Post by **Muffinman** » 07 Dec 2004 17:40

It's okay, Henry. At least I know what you're talking about. It's definately possible completely downtime and nothing like a whirl. It would probably be easier to non-whirl when done symposium. I don't do barrages much because I the them, but my toe barrage is clean and I don't do any of that fake barrage (whirling....) crap ;p

james · Post by **james** » 07 Dec 2004 21:47

Word, me neither.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 08 Dec 2004 03:30

So your first dex is hippy? I can't believe they are clean - can we have a video - and I expect your knee to be exactly over the bag as you do the first dex - not inside at all.

Sporatical_Distractions · Post by **Sporatical_Distractions** » 26 Dec 2004 13:48

i have messed around with a move similar to this one and have made contact downtime and non whirl. It was more like a reverse down double down then a reverse paradon. But i also think about it more as just using your utmost speed then anything else so it was probably sloppy as hell, but I know for a fact that if it is possible from a clipper then it is possible from toe.

HG · Post by HG » 16 Oct 2005 16:12

And you thought i was crazy

http://www.footbag.org/gallery/show/6056

Slowsis · Post by **Slowsis** » 16 Oct 2005 16:51

Those were some seriously non-whirling dexes!!!

HenryG wrote:toe>op in[DEX]>same in [DEX]>op clip[XBOD][DEL]

The only problem is that the jobs doesn't match the video. It would be considerably harder to hit the dexes hippy if it was set from op toe.

B_Man · Post by **B_Man** » 16 Oct 2005 20:17

That's because it's not Henry. Also, it's not the same trick

Slowsis · Post by **Slowsis** » 16 Oct 2005 20:21

I knew it was you....it was in your gallery!!!

I also knew it wasn't the same trick, i was just saying to hit what you did is easier (not to say your trick wasn't sick!) than if you set from op toe.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 17 Oct 2005 05:50

Nice Byrin but the second dex is "the" (and obviously the third, but I'm sure you know that). It looks like you could do it cleanly though.

B_Man · Post by **B_Man** » 17 Oct 2005 09:43

On the TATW? It's soo hard

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 17 Oct 2005 16:59

Yeah - well the terraging ss clipper I guess is what you actually hit - but the second dex is below your foot. - but then you work well with the third dex and have lots of time. I think if you were just going for terraging clipper rather than bailing out of triple atw you'd find it easy to clean - judging by the time you have on the move.

ShredOnLawn · Post by **ShredOnLawn** » 17 Oct 2005 23:03

Nice Henry, Nobody else has hit this except the few who kept it secret unlike you.

Ryan Mulroney did it but from the same toe.

modified

Reverse Paradon? Non whirl dexes

Reverse Paradon? Non whirl dexes

Re: Reverse Paradon? Non whirl dexes