Footbag on the Moon?

Faco · Post by **Faco** » 02 Nov 2005 17:56

Just imagine how many dexterities you could squeeze in there!

pips · Post by **pips** » 02 Nov 2005 18:02

Did you ever try to shred with a balloon? It sucks. To me atleast...

Bander87 · Post by **Bander87** » 02 Nov 2005 18:08

Hehe, would be hard in the space suit...

Faco · Post by **Faco** » 02 Nov 2005 18:35

Did you ever try to shred with a balloon? It sucks. To me atleast...

Yes, but on the Moon, balloon and you move at the same speed.

*edit:
Like underwater shred

pips · Post by **pips** » 02 Nov 2005 18:59

Yeah, you will fall at the same rate as the bag, and I obviously have no experience, but I kinda thought that on the moon you could still move your arms and legs as fast as you can here on Earth. Correct me if I am wrong.

Bander87 · Post by **Bander87** » 02 Nov 2005 19:17

Things just fall slower, but you still have your quickness.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 03 Nov 2005 00:25

I don't like your chances in current space suits of hitting much at all but if we're talking about some kind of hotel on the moon where you can be in shred gear in your airtight room then yeah you could definitely bust some hardcore shit. Basically you'd be able to move your legs at basically the same speed as on Earth (maybe even very slightly faster) but the force pulling the footbag down would be less so it would fall slower (and rise higher for less energy).

Slowsis · Post by **Slowsis** » 03 Nov 2005 01:23

Symp. Delusional Mofly Swirl!!!!

I'm so moving to the moon........

ville · Post by **ville** » 03 Nov 2005 04:58

I would assume that stalling would be pretty different on the moon. They would probably be easier to catch, but you have to wait for the bag to fall and it would mess up your rythm. And all the small hops and jumps you do while playing would lift you off the ground. Imagine an Atomic set on the moon. It would be so different that you would have to learn to play again.

Zac Jackson · Post by **Zac Jackson** » 03 Nov 2005 13:31

I would finally be able to do atw xD

Jdigges · Post by **Jdigges** » 04 Nov 2005 09:38

symp dexes would be sooood easy. You'd set the bag and jump like 6ft in the air doing all types of crazy stuff.

dragonhack · Post by **dragonhack** » 04 Nov 2005 11:08

Zoikoson wrote:I would finally be able to do atw xD

i'll finally be able to do a triple atw!!!
that would blow my mind!
as would the extreme pressure put on my body due to the lack of oxygen if i werent in a space suit..humm...

Laroche · Post by **Laroche** » 04 Nov 2005 14:53

Stop hypnotizing me with your signature.

ville · Post by **ville** » 04 Nov 2005 15:15

Laroche wrote:Stop hypnotizing me with your signature.

Quoted for truth!

Faco · Post by **Faco** » 06 Nov 2005 17:06

There's a silver Gamecube in her hand!

Wow, the only nice thing to look at

peanutbuterboy · Post by **peanutbuterboy** » 06 Nov 2005 18:34

ville wrote:
Laroche wrote:Stop hypnotizing me with your signature.
Quoted for truth!

yeah I vote new sig for you.

SandWraith · Post by **SandWraith** » 06 Nov 2005 21:10

...or a religion devoted to worshipping the hypnotizing plastic person signature.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 07 Nov 2005 06:50

On a similar topic, today I hit sailing op dellusional op sailing op mirage.

toe>same in>op out>op out>same out>op in>op out>op in>op toe.

In a swimming pool with a milo footbag. Don't know if the stall counted but all the dexes were uptime

HighDemonslayer · Post by **HighDemonslayer** » 07 Nov 2005 12:11

On your own private space station., you could adjust the gravity to see what tricks are the baddest at whichever gravity, and still maintain balance. .2G .5G .75G ?????????

Or, on earth, you could ride in one of those zero gravity simulator planes.

It would take alot more trips to figure out the optimal shred conditions, but would be cheaper than the space station.-n