3 dexes downtime Toe 2 Toe move

Jorden · Post by **Jorden** » 14 Feb 2006 12:18

Cool trick. The 2nd dex might've been a bit 'swirl'y and/or shoey though. It's great to see you pushing the huge toe tricks!

I think Josh Gayhart posted a while ago that he hit the pdx version of this...or something. Maybe you could ask him.

FootbagGuru · Post by **FootbagGuru** » 14 Feb 2006 13:46

cool trick yo

Cod · Post by **Cod** » 14 Feb 2006 15:26

Thanks guys for all these comments! I think I should done the first dex faster, because now the first and the second dex are almost in the same time and because of that it's hard to see the last one. I'll try to Pixie that shit, but it will be really hard!

Anz · Post by **Anz** » 15 Feb 2006 06:30

Cod wrote:Pixie that shit

"That Shit" is a great name for it!

mosher · Post by **mosher** » 15 Feb 2006 10:55

Sam, here is the jobs notation:

toe>>op in>(no plant while) op in>op out>same toe

AMAAAAZING trick cod!

I am going to try it tonight, surely I won't hit it but I bet it feels great to fling your legs around like that.

Tsiangkun · Post by **Tsiangkun** » 15 Feb 2006 11:12

like a symposium fog on the toes ?

Cod · Post by **Cod** » 15 Feb 2006 12:11

Tsiangkun wrote:like a symposium fog on the toes ?

Yes, but all three dexes are downtime and the second dex is extremaly "swirly"

.

krawallier · Post by **krawallier** » 15 Feb 2006 14:19

big props!!!
but i am really wondering how clean the 1st /3rd dex is. or to be more exact i think they really aren't two dexes. if you don't look at the second dex, only at the left-leg dexes, there really is no miraging component. if it were set from right foot clipper there really would have been no first dex. all that happens is that the bag moves to the outside of the first dexing leg, but it doesn't really travel to the inside again... i don't know how to make it more distinctive/ really clean. other thoughts? reminds me of something like reverse "what?", where the non-swirl-dex starts being hippy but then is leggy in the end...
... huge move nonetheless.

Cod · Post by **Cod** » 15 Feb 2006 15:29

Max, I know what are you talking about. I was watching this video frame by frame many times to decide if this move is clean or not. In my opinion, the first and the second dexes are performed in the same time (which is not so good) but the first dex and the third dex are really there (which is good). I can't make a screenshot, but there is a one frame which shows us the bag just before the third dex. The leg on left (my right leg) is just ending the second dex and the bag is on the left side of the leg on right. Hahaha, these sentences sound ridiculous because of my weak English but I hope you understand me

.

krawallier · Post by **krawallier** » 15 Feb 2006 15:36

i totally understand your english. i guess technical footbag talk always sounds ridiculous

you are right that the bag is visible "between" both legs before the third dex. but the windows are so big that i am not sure if it has really been circled by your right leg before in the sense a dex would require it too.

but whatever. IMO go and hit this move often nonetheless... cause it looks cool no matter what.

Cod · Post by **Cod** » 15 Feb 2006 15:43

I'd definitely try to hit this move again! Maybe next time it will be cleaner

.

*Jethro* · Post by ***Jethro*** » 16 Feb 2006 01:52

did you purposley not do a pixie at the start

King Monkey · Post by **King Monkey** » 16 Feb 2006 03:02

yeh your English is fine man! I swear alot of Europeans i met think their English is so bad when really it is fine.

HG · Post by HG » 16 Feb 2006 06:27

i was trying this trick like a year ago and had it off my foot. Its so sweet, NICE COD!

Anz · Post by **Anz** » 16 Feb 2006 06:31

HenryG wrote:i was trying this trick like a year ago and had it off my foot. Its so sweet, NICE COD!

Yeah right, liar.

I had this "That shit" on my foot 18 years ago.

Splint · Post by **Splint** » 16 Feb 2006 13:48

I think you should name it "Cod Piece"

Cod · Post by **Cod** » 16 Feb 2006 15:47

I think, I won't name it. Josh has hit it before me. Props to him

.

max · Post by **max** » 17 Feb 2006 06:02

Props Cod. Huge move. To tell you the truth I htink that the first and second dexes being done at the same time is not really a problem (think symp. whirling swirl, butterfly swirl, voodoo to some extent). Yet I see what Max K. Is saying. If you did this trick without the second dex would it be considered clean? Like a muted toe schmoe?

Anyway, I think this move ROCKS.

Samurai · Post by **Samurai** » 21 Feb 2006 11:49