Dan Fearey's a Prick

Splint · Post by **Splint** » 16 Feb 2006 10:39

Just wanted to do a little survey in extremely poor taste.

mosher · Post by **mosher** » 16 Feb 2006 11:00

The really confusing bit is that he's quite a nice boy in real life...

SandWraith · Post by **SandWraith** » 16 Feb 2006 11:03

Maybe life's just been stressful lately? It's not a very valid excuse, but I think there are times in everyone's life when they just get frustrated and angry with everything. Might or might not be the case; just throwing it out there.

carl winslow · Post by **carl winslow** » 16 Feb 2006 12:06

Nah, I think he does make some good points in his posts.
The rest of his shtick is just a gimick, like being the bad guy in pro wrestling.
he keeps things interesting in the non footbag part of modified.

carl winslow · Post by **carl winslow** » 16 Feb 2006 12:07

hes the flex this of 2006

shredzilla · Post by **shredzilla** » 16 Feb 2006 12:31

carl winslow wrote:Nah, I think he does make some good points in his posts.
The rest of his shtick is just a gimick, like being the bad guy in pro wrestling.
he keeps things interesting in the non footbag part of modified.

Haha well put Carl. Brad your response about the government coming in and guiding when addiction's involved I thought was a good one that I hadn't thought of. Plus, where was he during wire-tapping?

Dan's a character. He at least confined it to the Discussion forum, and the Warning does say Reader Beware. But we'd be a bland forum if we didn't have guys like him, Blackened, and Sam to shake things up once in a while. At least it's not off the hook with trolls and 12 year olds like some forums.

Although I would hate to be a mod and get some of his hate-PMs once in a while. That would probably get old.

Iron Clad Ben · Post by **Iron Clad Ben** » 16 Feb 2006 13:04

Perhaps we can change his title to "Forum Douchebag". Provides a fair warning I'd say.

sampotter · Post by **sampotter** » 16 Feb 2006 14:01

Best thread ever!

I hope I can kick it with Dan sometime soon and laugh about all of this.

BainbridgeShred · Post by **BainbridgeShred** » 16 Feb 2006 15:59

Five people besides myself want to suck me off. I take that as a victory.

brian relly · Post by **brian relly** » 16 Feb 2006 16:10

Hey, I was first in line.

Splint · Post by **Splint** » 16 Feb 2006 16:21

BainbridgeShred wrote:Five people besides myself want to suck me off. I take that as a victory.

AND one person doesn't think you're a prick. I guess there's a pot of gold at the end of every rainbow.

BainbridgeShred · Post by **BainbridgeShred** » 16 Feb 2006 16:26

AND one person doesn't think you're a prick. I guess there's a pot of gold at the end of every rainbow.

What do I care? People atleast have the sense to know that it'd be stupid to ban me, thus making you look foolish for banning me originally. I'd rather be a prick than a fool.

Splint · Post by **Splint** » 16 Feb 2006 16:32

What's sad is that you're really both and you don't see it.

Chim-Chim · Post by **Chim-Chim** » 16 Feb 2006 16:32

It wouldn't be foolish for him to ban you. You're pissing off a lot of people it seems.. but like I've said before you put smiles on many people's faces with your behavior.

That's why I voted for him to not ban you.

Most likely, you'll eventually feel bad about acting in such a manner for such a long time and dissappear to forget how terribly you've shamed yourself.

mc · Post by mc » 16 Feb 2006 16:35

Iron Clad Ben wrote:Perhaps we can change his title to "Forum Douchebag". Provides a fair warning I'd say.

if this was a poll option, I would have picked it.

BainbridgeShred · Post by **BainbridgeShred** » 16 Feb 2006 16:37

You're welcome to title me anything you want.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 16 Feb 2006 17:01

BainbridgeShred wrote:
AND one person doesn't think you're a prick. I guess there's a pot of gold at the end of every rainbow.
What do I care? People atleast have the sense to know that it'd be stupid to ban me, thus making you look foolish for banning me originally. I'd rather be a prick than a fool.

I think this is a different topic - you were temporarily suspended for breaking the forum rules, and if you continue to do so you'll be temporarily suspended again and again every time it's warrented for longer periods each time until you stop breaking the rules. This topic is about the idea that a number of people have suggested of actually permenantly banning you so you never can post on this forum again. Like most people I'm opposed to that idea - I just wanted to clear up that I don't think the voting on this topic makes Brad look foolish at all. I wouldn't say that it is "stupid" to ban you - rather it creates a precedent that I wouldn't be happy with.

Splint · Post by **Splint** » 16 Feb 2006 17:28

For the record, I voted that you were a prick and should not be banned.

BainbridgeShred · Post by **BainbridgeShred** » 16 Feb 2006 17:39

what rules were broken jeremy? no debate, just curious. dont bring up any of the "racist comments" i made though because thats bullshit and i never made a single racist comment on this board. i still would like to give ken back to the asians though.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 16 Feb 2006 17:42

I'm sorry I wasn't involved in you being banned - you'll have to talk to the people who were. I'm fairly sure they would have sent you a message to let you know the reason for that decision. It's not really my place to comment.

Dan Fearey's a Prick

What do you think?

Dan Fearey's a Prick