add.9

setman · Post by **setman** » 18 Jul 2006 22:59

i had an idea about the trick in last summer, but i filmed with stepping this trick only yesterday. it's the old concept i guess - matt cross have hit that.

it's add.9 trick - blurry miraging symp. miraging (no plant) ss butterfly, the third dex is a bit thin but there is.

download

thanks for the server.

QuantumBalance · Post by **QuantumBalance** » 18 Jul 2006 23:28

Nice trick. (really!!!)

I dunno what it is. But, I'm sorry to say that it's not 9 adds. Looks like about 5.

funklovesfootbag · Post by **funklovesfootbag** » 19 Jul 2006 00:02

That is SWEET, but the 3rd dex is totally thin (right at your foot,) I slowed it down in windows movie maker and checked it out.

Anyone want to list the adds for this? I'm not sure what it breaks down to.

setman · Post by **setman** » 19 Jul 2006 00:12

it's like blurry voodoo (add.7) bailed on ss butterfly(add.3) so = add.9

[dex][pdx][dex][xdex][dex][bod][dex][xbd][del]

King Monkey · Post by **King Monkey** » 19 Jul 2006 02:42

Hey Kamil i can see where you are going with it and it would be a 9 add trick, but the symp miraging dex is pretty much 'the' as far as i can see and there is much too little separation between the mirage dex and the butterfly dex for it to be considered clean, IMHO. The dexes dont 'look' complete, and the butterfly contacts your catching foot before the butterfly dex, or is too close to call. It would be ridiculously hard to make this trick clean because of trying to do non-planted butterfly dex with the same leg as the symp mirage. A plant here would rock but would probably be impossible. If you could hit the move with more separation between the dexes, maybe it would be clean.

Just my opinion, im no expert.

C-Fan · Post by **C-Fan** » 19 Jul 2006 02:57

Huh, looks a lot like a "the" blurry mofly. Interesting idea, but the cleanliness isn`t there. The main problem looks to be the third dex. Thanks for sharing; I`d like to see more attempts at this. I know how hard it is to clean blurry voodoo, so adding stuff to it is understandably challenging.

BalinorNZ · Post by **BalinorNZ** » 19 Jul 2006 03:00

Well ur asking for it Kamil...

The stepping set looks slurry to me but it's impossible to tell because of ur black clothing. The mirage dex goes over the bag with the tip of ur toe, to me that is as the as doing atw by moving your foot over the bag instead of around. I don't see many people do butterflies out of moves like that, but it looks like the 2nd dex on a very the dada curve, so I would say that dex is the aswell.

Have you hit blurry mofly? With a move like that it looks like blurry mofly would be a piece of cake for you

max · Post by **max** » 19 Jul 2006 03:27

Props setman.

I see this trick as a stepping pdx miraging op symp. miraging op refrction.

So yeah, a bunch of adds no doubt. But this trick like quite some others suffers from there being two consecutive same leg dexes in opposite direction without a plant (the last two) This is super hard to do clean no matter what way you look at it.

but again: props

setman · Post by **setman** » 19 Jul 2006 03:59

nic, i haven't hit blurry mofly, cause i don't have even good superfly.

thanks for the props.

when i will have camera, i'll try to hit this trick 100 times, i think, one of them will be clean.

HG · Post by HG » 19 Jul 2006 05:12

Name it Joan

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 19 Jul 2006 05:17

The last two dexes weren't all there. Name it HenryG.

HG · Post by HG » 19 Jul 2006 05:19

It looked like you pulled out a little early, name it Johnny

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 19 Jul 2006 05:19

Better than late I guess.

Henry, act your age, not your tiltless record.

HG · Post by HG » 19 Jul 2006 05:20

I'm not dan feary

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 19 Jul 2006 05:21

I love you Henry. I didn't mean it.

Back on topic starting... now.

habitat · Post by **habitat** » 19 Jul 2006 06:48

I don't see how you would call that a refraction when your hips don't even turn at all for an osis. It also looked like a blurry mofly to me.

Sporatical_Distractions · Post by **Sporatical_Distractions** » 19 Jul 2006 08:54

mos def looks like blurry mofly

max · Post by **max** » 19 Jul 2006 09:09

It's closer to a blury paratoxic than it is to a blurry mofly (in jobs anyway).

david · Post by **david** » 19 Jul 2006 11:57

This might rival mosher's tail for massive trick of the week. I'm not sure. Backflip after it and it's yours man.

Post by **Zac Miley** » 19 Jul 2006 12:24

david wrote:This might rival mosher's tail for massive trick of the week. I'm not sure. Backflip after it and it's yours man.

LMFAO.