add.9

Tripp · Post by **Tripp** » 19 Jul 2006 13:33

I don't see one miraging thing in there (except the blurry). Looks like a really big slurred Blurry Osis to me.

setman · Post by **setman** » 19 Jul 2006 13:44

yeah, big, great josh always hit big clean moves - he's the best, what else i can say.

BalinorNZ · Post by **BalinorNZ** » 19 Jul 2006 15:32

Johnny wrote:Better than late I guess.

Henry, act your age, not your tiltless record.

Hahaha owned.

Tripp · Post by **Tripp** » 19 Jul 2006 16:22

I was just stating what it looks like to me. Don't get mad at me if you can't clean it. I hope you do.

Spontaneous Spaz · Post by **Spontaneous Spaz** » 19 Jul 2006 19:04

apparently i can't see this movie... is there another link to it? cuz the other doesn't work.. or something?

Guest_2 · Post by **Guest_2** » 19 Jul 2006 20:13

lol you guys all suck

He said it was a bit thin so quit breaking his balls
Especially when none of you agree

Good job! Good luck cleaning it up, can't wait to see it perfect!

Spontaneous Spaz · Post by **Spontaneous Spaz** » 19 Jul 2006 20:44

i'm looking at it.. and i only see 5, maybe 6 adds... how could that be 9?

C-Fan · Post by **C-Fan** » 19 Jul 2006 21:04

If this trick were cleanly hit:

1. The first dex (the stepping set) gets one add (DEX)

2. The second dex (mirage) would get 2 adds (DEX and PDX)

3. The third dex (mirage) would get 3 adds (DEX, BOD [symp] and XDEX)

4. The 4th dex would get 3 or 4 adds (DEX, XBD, DEL, and symp if you count symp on butterflies.)

Since most people don`t give butterfly symposium, Setman counted 9 adds.

setman · Post by **setman** » 20 Jul 2006 01:16

Johnny wrote:The last two dexes weren't all there..

In this trick too ?

max · Post by **max** » 20 Jul 2006 02:25

No the dexes are there! But I still think it's a symp. miraging refraction at the end.

It reminds of when I was starting to try torques and I'd always do miraging refraction instead of miraging osis.

By the way setman: could you hit that? a pixie or stepping op miraing op symp. miraging osis? That would rule

setman · Post by **setman** » 20 Jul 2006 03:44

i've tried, but it's so hard, haven't hit that (yet)

BalinorNZ · Post by **BalinorNZ** » 20 Jul 2006 05:28

max wrote:stepping op miraing op symp. miraging osis? That would rule

blurry torquescrew?

max · Post by **max** » 20 Jul 2006 05:53

blurry torquescrew?

sorry it was misleading, I meant blurry blurry symp torque

if that makes any sense. In job's it should be something like:

clip > op in > op in > symp op in > op osis

FlexThis · Post by **FlexThis** » 20 Jul 2006 10:52

I give it 8 - if its clean.

X-dex would make it 9.

Sweet move

Props!

~peace
Damon

sampotter · Post by **sampotter** » 20 Jul 2006 10:59

max wrote:
blurry torquescrew?

sorry it was misleading, I meant blurry blurry symp torque

if that makes any sense. In job's it should be something like:

clip > op in > op in > symp op in > op osis

I think for once f.org comes in huge here -- pdx miraging smp torque = voodoo torque.

Xain · Post by **Xain** » 20 Jul 2006 11:35

I've played around with the last part of that move-the simultaneous mirage butterfly- a little bit myself, and I think it's very hard to clean it unless it's hangtime. But I think in this case, since the butterfly dex doesn't get symp, neither should the mirage part, IMO.

shreddaily · Post by **shreddaily** » 20 Jul 2006 12:30

Could someone remind me of that famous Allan Haggett quote...and put it all in caps and about 30 exclamation points at the end. Thanks.

JeffRichards · Post by **JeffRichards** » 22 Jul 2006 10:18

after watching it a couple times i finally understand it. clean that shit up and your the fucking man!!!

beenjammin · Post by **beenjammin** » 23 Jul 2006 07:34

ITs seven adds guys learn how to count! Though its not clean it looks cool as hell which is what footbag is all about. Id like to see it mid strring!

shredzilla · Post by **shredzilla** » 23 Jul 2006 07:51