Post Count

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 03 May 2007 19:21

Switch Kicker wrote:
And just what, Jeremy, did I lose?

lol. We should bring back the modified awards and have one for "dumbest person." I'm not going to explain the joke, but why don't you try to figure it out for yourself.

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 04 May 2007 07:42

Jeremy wrote:
Switch Kicker wrote:
And just what, Jeremy, did I lose?
lol. We should bring back the modified awards and have one for "dumbest person." I'm not going to explain the joke, but why don't you try to figure it out for yourself.

What joke, where? Maybe you're just losing it Jeremy, but you never posted a joke in this topic. Funny how no one else understands just what "joke" you're talking about.

PegLegHolly · Post by **PegLegHolly** » 04 May 2007 08:57

hey you two... have you tried NOT replying to each other in a thread? Everyone understands you two disagree on almost everything, would you mind just PM'ing each other these arguements? Leave the thread open for useful information.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 04 May 2007 09:30

lol, what useful information are you expecting to appear in this topic?

Slowsis · Post by **Slowsis** » 04 May 2007 09:54

This thread is awesome!

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 04 May 2007 10:37

Jeremy wrote:lol, what useful information are you expecting to appear in this topic?

There it is again, spam. Maybe you're the liar.

And just because the information presented here isn't useful to you, doesn't mean it's not useful to others. Maybe someone here is truthfully wondering what the hell a post counter is used for, or what it means. Not to mention, when people are bored, it's useful to some, to come on here, and talk about pointless shit. Passes the time, you see. Like right now, I'm done with my work and waiting for class to get out. But unlike you, Jeremy, I'm not going to sit inside for another 6 hours looking up definitions of witty words to say in my next deliberately induced argument.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 04 May 2007 15:30

That's clearly not spam, it's clearly a response to a statement made by somebody the post before. If somebody in a topic makes a post, and you respond with your opinion, it's certainly not spam.

Regarding the possible information you've suggested, how will posts like this one stop that information from being accessed?

Also I hope you're aware of how ridiculous your post is. Holly was attacking both of us for continuing this meaningless (but rather fun) argument, and you're defending her post by continuing the argument, the very thing she was complaining about. Do you see how that's just mental?

Uranos · Post by **Uranos** » 05 May 2007 03:18

lol switch kicker your a joke. yeah

jay7 · Post by **jay7** » 05 May 2007 03:42

You guys make me want someone to hug and cower in terror with. Will this post make you say the next time you start to argue about something? Likely not.

Anyway, I used to be "pro post count" because when you have 1000 posts, people seem to take you more seriously. Now I sorta realize that if you just have a genuinely more productive post, you don't need 1000 of them for people to give you a tiny bit of respect.

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 05 May 2007 10:11

Jeremy wrote:That's clearly not spam, it's clearly a response to a statement made by somebody the post before. If somebody in a topic makes a post, and you respond with your opinion, it's certainly not spam.

It's spam if it's completely useless to the topic, or degrading the existence of the topic.

Jeremy wrote:Regarding the possible information you've suggested, how will posts like this one stop that information from being accessed?

No, but the negative attitude deters people from wanting to read the topic.

Jeremy wrote:Also I hope you're aware of how ridiculous your post is. Holly was attacking both of us for continuing this meaningless (but rather fun) argument, and you're defending her post by continuing the argument, the very thing she was complaining about. Do you see how that's just mental?

I know full well she was telling us both to stop.

However, I did not defend her post BY continuing the argument. I continued the argument, and then defended her reasoning afterwards. I can see a point and choose not to live by it, Jeremy. I can see why she tells us to just shut the fuck up and stop spamming our bullshit around. And I can even agree with her that it's stupid. But I don't have to abide by it. Just like you don't have to.

So no, I don't see how that's just mental. I see how it's just rude however. I see how I acknowledged her post, made it clear that it was a legitimate post with good reasoning, but I'm not going to take it into consideration on my next post, or any posts fallowing that.

Me continuing the argument was not used in any way to support her post.

And I wasn't supporting her suggestion, I was supporting her reasoning. That this has nothing to do with the topic, and that it's nothing but spam. And I know I spam, but I don't deny that I do it. I don't lie, like you do.

Jeremy, you're the one who's mental. Which is probably the reason you got it mixed up.

apoplectic · Post by **apoplectic** » 08 May 2007 09:56

new subject!:

i accually like the disscussion forum.i love a good argument.

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 08 May 2007 12:37

apoplectic wrote:new subject!:

i accually like the disscussion forum.i love a good argument.

Who doesn't?