234567
234567
Another one of those e-mails that comes around once a year for now:
"On May 6th, 2007 at 2:03 and four seconds in the morning it will be 02:03:04 05/06/07."
"On May 6th, 2007 at 2:03 and four seconds in the morning it will be 02:03:04 05/06/07."
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
Emily Kulczyk
Emily Kulczyk
- QuantumBalance
- 100-Watt Warlock
- Posts: 5092
- Joined: 22 Apr 2002 14:24
- Location: fractal tyedye nebulae
- Contact:
- Blue_turnip
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: 29 Nov 2004 03:55
- Location: Melbourne
- max
- Australofrenchbrityorkus
- Posts: 3751
- Joined: 24 Apr 2002 00:12
- Location: Bondi Beach, Australia
- Contact:
Wikipedia tells me that only 5 countries use the mm/dd/yyyy format:
* Canada (Although most official documents use the yyyy-mm-dd format, the m/d/yy format is also understood due to influences from the United States.)
* Federated States of Micronesia
* Palau
* Philippines (formerly d/m/yy. May still be found in certain contexts)
* United States (Although Independence Day is often referred to as "the Fourth of July.")
A majority use the dd/mm/yyyy and another group of nations use the yyy/mm/dd format.
More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format
So yes, it will depend where you live.
* Canada (Although most official documents use the yyyy-mm-dd format, the m/d/yy format is also understood due to influences from the United States.)
* Federated States of Micronesia
* Palau
* Philippines (formerly d/m/yy. May still be found in certain contexts)
* United States (Although Independence Day is often referred to as "the Fourth of July.")
A majority use the dd/mm/yyyy and another group of nations use the yyy/mm/dd format.
More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format
So yes, it will depend where you live.
Maxime Boucoiran
French ConneXion
BFC
French ConneXion
BFC
- Blue_turnip
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: 29 Nov 2004 03:55
- Location: Melbourne
mm/dd/yy defies logic. the elements are in seemingly random order. Countries who use this are incorrect. 
dd/mm/yy goes in ascending order and therefore obeys common sense.
edit: yy/mm/dd is acceptable, however it is still inferior to dd/mm/yy because people are usually concerned with days and months before years and so dd/mm/yy reveals what is most important first.
dd/mm/yy goes in ascending order and therefore obeys common sense.
edit: yy/mm/dd is acceptable, however it is still inferior to dd/mm/yy because people are usually concerned with days and months before years and so dd/mm/yy reveals what is most important first.
Oliver Adams
in America, we are able to infer the year.
And we only say the month if it is different than the current month.
So like I'm going to party on the fifth, and backpacking on the 29th.
On June 17 I am going to run a marathon.
In other places they are retard and say things like on the 8th of May, whereas we just say May 8th.
OUR representation IS consistent with out spoken language, thus it is logical.
As much as you would like to believe your system is consistent, check it :
hh:mm:ss:dd:mm:yyyy
Notice how hour is greater than minute is greater than seconds is smaller than day ?
Logical would be ss:mm:hh:dd:mm:yyyy and NO ONE uses that.
Thusly, I would just like to say, you are wrong and I am right. Bugger off you limey bloke.
And we only say the month if it is different than the current month.
So like I'm going to party on the fifth, and backpacking on the 29th.
On June 17 I am going to run a marathon.
In other places they are retard and say things like on the 8th of May, whereas we just say May 8th.
OUR representation IS consistent with out spoken language, thus it is logical.
As much as you would like to believe your system is consistent, check it :
hh:mm:ss:dd:mm:yyyy
Notice how hour is greater than minute is greater than seconds is smaller than day ?
Logical would be ss:mm:hh:dd:mm:yyyy and NO ONE uses that.
Thusly, I would just like to say, you are wrong and I am right. Bugger off you limey bloke.
- shredzilla
- Post Master General
- Posts: 3260
- Joined: 14 Oct 2005 06:24
- Location: Paradise Lost
- Contact:
- Switch Kicker
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: 29 May 2005 16:04
- Location: Albert Lea, Minnesota
...Blue_turnip wrote:mm/dd/yy defies logic. the elements are in seemingly random order. Countries who use this are incorrect.
dd/mm/yy goes in ascending order and therefore obeys common sense.
edit: yy/mm/dd is acceptable, however it is still inferior to dd/mm/yy because people are usually concerned with days and months before years and so dd/mm/yy reveals what is most important first.
mm/dd/yyyy
mm = 12
dd = 30-31
yyyy = in the thousands. J00 phail?


- QuantumBalance
- 100-Watt Warlock
- Posts: 5092
- Joined: 22 Apr 2002 14:24
- Location: fractal tyedye nebulae
- Contact:
- Switch Kicker
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: 29 May 2005 16:04
- Location: Albert Lea, Minnesota
- Blue_turnip
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: 29 Nov 2004 03:55
- Location: Melbourne
Exactly, if the month isn't the most important thing, why list it first.Tsiangkun wrote: And we only say the month if it is different than the current month.
So like I'm going to party on the fifth, and backpacking on the 29th.
Lol that's just funny.Tsiangkun wrote: In other places they are retard
Generally the hours, minutes, seconds bit is separate to the days months years bit.Tsiangkun wrote: As much as you would like to believe your system is consistent, check it :
hh:mm:ss:dd:mm:yyyy
I honestly have never seen somone go 12:04:56:23:6:2007. If someone has done this, then i lol @ them.
edit:
How is 8th of May more retarded than May 8th?Tsiangkun wrote: In other places they are retard and say things like on the 8th of May, whereas we just say May 8th.
If two letters more is really that difficult for you, then i give you my sympathy.
And as spoken goes its alot harder to link two words when the first one ends in a vowellish sound and the next one starts in a vowellish sound.
You'd be retarded if you did this when you could just say something phonetically similar to "8th've May".
Oliver Adams
For archival purposes (the most important purposes, obviously...), it only makes sense to record the date in DESCENDING order... It's complete silliness to try to organize information primarily based on the day, and especially the time. If you wanted to find "something", you would need to look through that day for EVERY SINGLE YEAR...
There is no way other than:
Year, Month, Day.
There is no way other than:
Year, Month, Day.
- Blue_turnip
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: 29 Nov 2004 03:55
- Location: Melbourne
What do you mean by "archival purposes"? If it has any thing to do with a computer then they can just as easily be programmed to look at the yyyy bit regardless of what side its on. If you're talking about a file cabinet then you'd probably have different draws for different years etc. "archival purposes" is pretty ambiguous.
Oliver Adams
- Blue_turnip
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: 29 Nov 2004 03:55
- Location: Melbourne
I just noticed this inferior post. I find it hard to believe you didn't realise that I was talking about ascending order in terms of how big the units of time are, which is really what matters.Switch Kicker wrote:...Blue_turnip wrote:mm/dd/yy defies logic. the elements are in seemingly random order. Countries who use this are incorrect.
dd/mm/yy goes in ascending order and therefore obeys common sense.
edit: yy/mm/dd is acceptable, however it is still inferior to dd/mm/yy because people are usually concerned with days and months before years and so dd/mm/yy reveals what is most important first.
mm/dd/yyyy
mm = 12
dd = 30-31
yyyy = in the thousands. J00 phail?
Oliver Adams
Blue_turnip wrote:Exactly, if the month isn't the most important thing, why list it first.Tsiangkun wrote: And we only say the month if it is different than the current month.
So like I'm going to party on the fifth, and backpacking on the 29th.
Because you little shrub fan, just putting the number 5 on a piece of paper is uninformative. It could be a date, or it could be the results of your IQ test.
blue turnip wrote:Generally the hours, minutes, seconds bit is separate to the days months years bit.Tsiangkun wrote: As much as you would like to believe your system is consistent, check it :
hh:mm:ss:dd:mm:yyyy
I honestly have never seen somone go 12:04:56:23:6:2007. If someone has done this, then i lol @ them.
You can justify your logical inconsitency to yourself how ever you like, just don't try to pretend there is more logic to one system or another. I keep my time as the number of seconds that has passed since 00:00:00 UTC January 1, 1970.
Because retards have a hard time with language that puts two vowel sounds together. Normal people can handle it just fine.blue turnip wrote:How is 8th of May more retarded than May 8th?Tsiangkun wrote: In other places they are retard and say things like on the 8th of May, whereas we just say May 8th.
If two letters more is really that difficult for you, then i give you my sympathy.
And as spoken goes its alot harder to link two words when the first one ends in a vowellish sound and the next one starts in a vowellish sound.
You'd be retarded if you did this when you could just say something phonetically similar to "8th've May".
- Blue_turnip
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: 29 Nov 2004 03:55
- Location: Melbourne
How was what you said related to what I said. I went "If the month isn't the most important thing, why list it first?", as in, if you say you only state the month if its different than the current one, then why put it first in mm/dd/yy? that has nothing to do with scrawling the number 5 on a piece of paper. What the hell? lol.Tsiangkun wrote:Blue_turnip wrote:Exactly, if the month isn't the most important thing, why list it first.Tsiangkun wrote: And we only say the month if it is different than the current month.
So like I'm going to party on the fifth, and backpacking on the 29th.
Because you little shrub fan, just putting the number 5 on a piece of paper is uninformative. It could be a date, or it could be the results of your IQ test.
How am I pretending that there is more logic to one system as opposed to another. There IS. I've never heard of a hh:mm:ss:dd:mm:yy or a hh:mm:ss:mm:dd:yy format in my life. The measurement time within one day is kept separate to the measurement greater. With that in mind dd/mm/yy is logically superior.Tsiangkun wrote:blue turnip wrote:Generally the hours, minutes, seconds bit is separate to the days months years bit.Tsiangkun wrote: As much as you would like to believe your system is consistent, check it :
hh:mm:ss:dd:mm:yyyy
I honestly have never seen somone go 12:04:56:23:6:2007. If someone has done this, then i lol @ them.
You can justify your logical inconsitency to yourself how ever you like, just don't try to pretend there is more logic to one system or another. I keep my time as the number of seconds that has passed since 00:00:00 UTC January 1, 1970.
Go ahead and keep your time as such, I'm debating as to what date format is better in terms of logic.
Lol you're obviously too daft to realise that I was mocking the fact that you find it noticably easier to refer to something as 'may 8th' as opposed to '8th of may', which is just stupid.Tsiangkun wrote:Because retards have a hard time with language that puts two vowel sounds together. Normal people can handle it just fine.blue turnip wrote:How is 8th of May more retarded than May 8th?Tsiangkun wrote: In other places they are retard and say things like on the 8th of May, whereas we just say May 8th.
If two letters more is really that difficult for you, then i give you my sympathy.
And as spoken goes its alot harder to link two words when the first one ends in a vowellish sound and the next one starts in a vowellish sound.
You'd be retarded if you did this when you could just say something phonetically similar to "8th've May".
The nested quotes are getting MASSIVE, lol.
Just out of curiosity, what's a shrub fan? Lol, i hope it's not too nasty.
Oliver Adams