Agreed. Prisoner of Azkaban was a good one too.Matt K wrote: Personally, I like Goblet of Fire the best, and Order of the Phoenix the least.
Harry Potter 7
- Disturbedboy365
- Multidex Master
- Posts: 249
- Joined: 14 Mar 2005 19:21
- Switch Kicker
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: 29 May 2005 16:04
- Location: Albert Lea, Minnesota
The movie went through about 6 chapters in 5 minutes.
I wish they would make a two part Harry Potter movie. Weren't they originally going to make GoF in two parts??
Order of the Phoenix movie is gonna be way stripped down. They had trouble fitting a lot of Prisoner of Azkaban into the movie version, and that's 1/2 the length of OotP.
I wish they would make a two part Harry Potter movie. Weren't they originally going to make GoF in two parts??
Order of the Phoenix movie is gonna be way stripped down. They had trouble fitting a lot of Prisoner of Azkaban into the movie version, and that's 1/2 the length of OotP.
Matt Kemmer
Definitly. The movie should have been two parts. I hope they don't cut so much in the new movie.Switch Kicker wrote:Goblet of Fire would've have been SOOO much better if they had actually SHOWN the Quidditch World Cup...
Ashley Danowski
"As a well spent day brings happy sleep, so life well spent brings happy death."
"As a well spent day brings happy sleep, so life well spent brings happy death."
alright i watched 1 and 2 yesterday to re cap, 3 is on today dunno about 4 its on abc family if you want to watch it. 5 PM i think and the next one is at 8 o clock PM, cant wait! oh and they give you LOADS of sneak peaks of number 7 , i feel like i already know everything thats going to happen

Ben Rea
I hate the movies with a burning passion. I watched the first one and it sucked. Now as I'm rereading all the books to prepare for the 7th (started yesterday, finished first, barely started second) I picture the movie characters in my head as the book goes along. Especially during dialogue. Ugh, it's gross!
Danny P.
- Bringerofpie
- Fearless
- Posts: 508
- Joined: 31 May 2007 13:12
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
I heard that the fifth movie has been actively differentiated from the book.
"Fuck it man, you just gotta do it."
Joe Snyder
Representing FLF (Fort Lauderdale Footbaggers)
http://onlycountria.myminicity.com
Joe Snyder
Representing FLF (Fort Lauderdale Footbaggers)
http://onlycountria.myminicity.com
im not a big fan, and i think i missed one in the middle, but i read the last one and im pretty sure Harry has to die. you know those things that voldemort stuck his soul in that need to be destroyed? I bet Harry is one of them cause his scar and all that, and to kill voldemort he's going to have to off himself.
i cant beleive im discussing harry potter in a footbag forum. lol.
i cant beleive im discussing harry potter in a footbag forum. lol.
- Zac Miley
- Post Master General
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: 04 Jun 2006 12:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Contact:
cammel wrote: I bet Harry is one of them cause his scar and all that, and to kill voldemort he's going to have to off himself.
JK Rowling already obliterated that theory.
Jay (8:06:01 PM): Bu-bu-buu-buug--Looks up, and the feeling goes away like a sneeze-bu-buuuh-BULLLSHITTT
Jay (8:06:14 PM): *wipes bellybutton*
Jay (8:06:14 PM): *wipes bellybutton*
- Switch Kicker
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: 29 May 2005 16:04
- Location: Albert Lea, Minnesota
- sanuke okumatzu
- Fearless
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 13 Nov 2005 11:05
- Location: halfway sane
- sanuke okumatzu
- Fearless
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 13 Nov 2005 11:05
- Location: halfway sane
I'm just saying... that seems like the cliche move to make. Evil guy is hero's father, a la darth vader? Didn't particularly care for the books when I read them, thus why I havn't read any of the others.BenRea wrote:nope not his father. his parents both got killed by voldemort but harry being the 'boy who lived', survived. no harry wants his vengance.
As the universe is curved, there cannot be a straight answer...

-Robert Baker-

-Robert Baker-

