Eskimos...

This section is specifically for serious non-footbag debate and discussion.
Post Reply
Guest_1
BSOS Beast
Posts: 471
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 21:15
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Eskimos...

Post by Guest_1 »

Muffinman
the gimp
Posts: 10375
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 15:34
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Muffinman »

"Eskimo" is a derogatory term.
Guest_1
BSOS Beast
Posts: 471
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 21:15
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Post by Guest_1 »

I apologize, if I had known I would've used Inuit. If anyone wants to correct it, I'd appreciate it. Not to justify my embarrassment, but I won't use the term eskimo in the future.
pips
Multidex Master
Posts: 262
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 00:21
Location: Pittsburgh

Post by pips »

I didn't know that. I knew the two terms meant the same, but I didn't know one was mean. Hmm.
Chrissy Fryer
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

I don't think it's actually mean or derogatory, it's just the name given to those people by white people, and they'd prefer to call themselves by the name they gave themselves.

There is the same issue in Australia with "Australian Aboriginals" and the term "indigenous Australians" is more politically correct (or even better are the names of each specific tribe or group).

Inuit isn't really correct either, as it refer specifically to the indigenous people of Canada and Greenland, while Eskimo also refers to the indigenous people of Alaska and Siberia, so if you're going to call them "Inuit" you also need to learn "Yupik" and "Unangam" (or "Aleut," which I think are the same as Unangam). Yupik and Unangam are both found in Alaska and Siberia.

Apparently Yupik people would prefer to be called "Eskimos" than be called "Inuit" and find "Inuit" more offensive.
User avatar
Moxie
Taphophile
Posts: 3610
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 09:46
Location: USA

Post by Moxie »

Jeremy wrote:I don't think it's actually mean or derogatory, it's just the name given to those people by white people, and they'd prefer to call themselves by the name they gave themselves.
I had a teacher who lived with Inuit people for a few years straight and they told him (*doesn't mean it's completely historicallyaccurate*) that the white people asked a different group of native people, "who are those people," asking about the Inuit people. The other native people responded, "Eskimo" which basically means eaters of raw flesh (and they do eat raw meat) which the Inuit people were pretty unhappy with because it makes them sound bad.

Wikipedia says that the translation of the word in that story is wrong, but:
Wikipedia wrote:Nevertheless, while the word is not inherently pejorative, owing to folklore and derogatory usage, since the 1970s in Canada and Greenland Eskimo has widely been considered offensive.
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."

Emily Kulczyk
User avatar
Eskimo Joe
Cold Blooded
Posts: 512
Joined: 17 Aug 2006 16:04
Location: Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada

Post by Eskimo Joe »

I am an Inuk.

I am not offended by people saying Eskimo. It is half of my user name!Neither is my mom who was born on the land. But it is true that Canadian natives of the North wish to be called Inuit, which means the people, where an inuk is a person.

But I don't get why you posted the link to the "woman..." thread. What was the relation to the title of this thread and the the link?

And in regards to what Moxie wrote, I was told that as well. That a tribe in the western arctic area refered to Inuit as Eskimo's, which was native to that tribe/band's tongue meaning raw meat eaters. Which of course most of us are.
Eskimo Joe
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

The point was that if you wrote the same thing about Eskimos instead of women, it would be deemed offensively racist and unacceptable. Josh was presumably suggesting the hypocrisy that such racism would not be tolerated, but sexism is.
User avatar
Blue_turnip
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1239
Joined: 29 Nov 2004 03:55
Location: Melbourne

Post by Blue_turnip »

I get called "ang mo" all the time, but do you see me complaining?

Jesus...
Oliver Adams
hacksterbator
Washed-Up Child Star
Posts: 4141
Joined: 12 Jul 2003 18:33
Location: Winterpeg, Manisnowba
Contact:

Post by hacksterbator »

Blue_turnip wrote:I get called "ang mo" all the time, but do you see me complaining?

Jesus...
i've got some other choice words to call you
A.G.
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

Blue_turnip wrote:I get called "ang mo" all the time, but do you see me complaining?

Jesus...
Just because you don't have a problem with racist terms being directed at you, doesn't mean that other people don't either. I've had racist comments directed at me over the years, especially in school, and some were just funny because the people were so stupid, but others were definitely genuinely insulting. I don't think people can comprehend real racism unless they're subjected to it, so I think the only morally acceptable thing to do is acknowledge that there are some people out there who are offended with the use of particular words, even if you know some people who are not, and that there are alternative words that get across the same meaning without being offensive and to use those alternatives so as not to avoid people.
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

Please insert the word "insult" into the place you think it would fit most appropriately in my last post.
Post Reply