Woman...

Moxie · Post by **Moxie** » 18 Nov 2007 11:38

Fred: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pot_callin ... ttle_black

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 18 Nov 2007 11:43

Moxie wrote:Fred: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pot_callin ... ttle_black

Heh, I was gonna wiki that myself, but I forgot to. Interesting saying.

BainbridgeShred · Post by **BainbridgeShred** » 18 Nov 2007 13:16

Make no mistake about it Fred, I'm not agreeing with you. I think on a general basis that women tend to be less rationale than men, but by no means does that mean women tend to be ignorant or more bitchy than men. In fact, most times I tend to be the bitchier one amongst my girlfriends, but that's just because I'm a divo and over react to things.

Also, you're definitely rating intelligence too high. Intelligence is worthless to me in deciding friends (Girls or guys). Or atleast the intelligence that you seem to be making a point of. If I looked for intelligence in my friends I would have missed out on some of the best lays and friendships of my life and would probably be hanging out with people like Jeremy.

Basically Fred, you're attracting the girls that are worthy of you. Very shitty ones it sounds.

BainbridgeShred · Post by **BainbridgeShred** » 18 Nov 2007 13:41

I'm generally a nice guy, I just have a really good ability to be a complete ass sometimes. Gets me what I want either way.

Not to get into the semantics of the issue, but you sound more like a prick than an asshole, Fred. The difference? A prick will act rude to someone with whom he's spent time creating a bond with (As evidenced by the fact that said girl called you 5 times in the span of 2 hours); whereas the asshole would never be in that situation at all, because he would have never created the necesary bond with someone he finds below his standards, and thus would never have led the said girl to believe that calling the said asshole was a good idea for either parties.

Assholism is based on a strong Libertarian foundation. Prick's just had shitty childhoods.

Texta · Post by **Texta** » 18 Nov 2007 14:39

Oh the beautiful irony. The guy calling women ignorant doesn't know the saying "the pot calling the kettle black".

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 18 Nov 2007 15:32

Switch; You failed to answer my question.

Are girls more ignorant than guys?

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 18 Nov 2007 21:55

BainbridgeShred wrote:Make no mistake about it Fred, I'm not agreeing with you.

I didn't say you were, Dan.

BainbridgeShred wrote:I think on a general basis that women tend to be less rationale than men, but by no means does that mean women tend to be ignorant or more bitchy than men. In fact, most times I tend to be the bitchier one amongst my girlfriends, but that's just because I'm a divo and over react to things.

Depends on the group I guess.

BainbridgeShred wrote:If I looked for intelligence in my friends I would have missed out on some of the best lays and friendships of my life and would probably be hanging out with people like Jeremy.

I laughed for some time when I read that. I don't look for intelligence either, but I do get annoyed sometimes after someone talks and talks and talks forever about nothing. I usually just ignore it though and pay more attention to whatever fun is planned or unplanned for the night.

BainbridgeShred wrote:Basically Fred, you're attracting the girls that are worthy of you. Very shitty ones it sounds.

'Twas a one time incident. I'm usually smarter about such things.

I like your post on "pricks" and "assholism". But after reading it, I'm still more of an asshole than a prick.

Jeremy wrote:Switch; You failed to answer my question.

Are girls more ignorant than guys?

Didn't, and still don't care to answer. It's not related to the topic. This topic has nothing to do with men. It's clearly named, "Women..." I didn't fail to answer your question, it just has nothing to do with the topic, so it was ignored.

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 19 Nov 2007 01:32

Just reposting one more time in this topic. I didn't think this would generate as much attention as it did. And I didn't really think too many people would find it as offensive as they do. It's just a big distraction that no body needs. Some of the things said in here (by me) were, a little too offensive I suppose. I wouldn't say I regret making the topic, I'd say I regret making the topic so... "aggressive" I suppose I could've worded it better... a lot better. But w/e.

Also, I apologize to anyone offended by this topic. I don't apologize for having the opinions (which were poorly and inaccurately described), I apologize for voicing them here, in a place that they really don't belong.

I hope for this topic to have no more posts, and to just die.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 19 Nov 2007 02:53

Switch Kicker wrote:It's clearly named, "Women..."

Actually it's clearly named "Woman..." but nice try...

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 19 Nov 2007 02:54

I'm guessing it refers to the number of females who actually tolerate your presence.

Moxie · Post by **Moxie** » 19 Nov 2007 10:17

Switch Kicker wrote:Offensive and personal! Not to mention cringworthy - please put more thought into future insults.

A mod forgot to sign his edit in Switch's post, please fix that.

Switch Kicker · Post by **Switch Kicker** » 19 Nov 2007 12:16

Jeremy wrote:I'm guessing it refers to the number of females who actually tolerate your presence.

Whatever you wanna think, Jeremy, I don't care.

Wu_ · Post by **Wu_** » 19 Nov 2007 16:30

Switch Kicker wrote:
Jeremy wrote:I'm guessing it refers to the number of females who actually tolerate your presence.
Whatever you wanna think, Jeremy, I don't care.

I think we all totally know that already. You two turn out to be the ones that get into the biggest cat fights of them all. One side usually using structured intelligence and the other not giving a fuck just swinging it out. Gotta read this forum more damn, always the best for a good healthy laugh.

And is it me or did Jeremy just through out one of his very very rare direct attacks...

brian relly · Post by **brian relly** » 19 Nov 2007 21:49

Clearly, Jeremy is only putting the pussy on a pedestal.

brian relly · Post by **brian relly** » 19 Nov 2007 21:52

*and therefore feels obligated to defend its honor on message boards.

Moxie · Post by **Moxie** » 19 Nov 2007 22:19

Switch, take a break from this thread and subforum.

Tsiangkun · Post by **Tsiangkun** » 19 Nov 2007 22:28

Switch Kicker wrote:Nothing is more aggravating than disagreeing with a girl, and even through the truth, is 100% crystal clear, right in front of their face, they will tell you that you're wrong, and argue, forever, until you give in. It's beyond fucking retarded.

I bet she is thinking the same thing.

remember that black hole thread ?
didn't you say that fast food is healthy ?

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 20 Nov 2007 02:35

Jeremy concedes that he was brought up in a female only hippy commune and that his views of feminism and women's rights could be seen as radical by some, but personally feels that he's views are rational, and everybody else is sexist. Jeremy is not the most radical feminist going around, as he strongly opposes the idea that all women should become lesbians.

ObArA'BaRs · Post by **ObArA'BaRs** » 20 Nov 2007 08:35

I love modi-fights.

Wu_ · Post by **Wu_** » 23 Nov 2007 17:26

ObArA'BaRs wrote:I love modi-fights.

Did you just come up with that!? Nice one

modified

Woman...

Re: Woman...