Will Bush be re-elected?

Senor Grommet · Post by **Senor Grommet** » 04 Feb 2004 21:05

Will Bush be re-elected?

yes or no anwers only

Rob · Post by **Rob** » 04 Feb 2004 21:08

hacksterbator · Post by **hacksterbator** » 04 Feb 2004 21:09

yes

edited for color!

Rob · Post by **Rob** » 04 Feb 2004 21:10

It has to be red! BLASPHEMER!

Matt · Post by **Matt** » 05 Feb 2004 10:29

Tsiangkun · Post by **Tsiangkun** » 05 Feb 2004 10:44

Senor Grommet wrote:Will Bush be re-elected?

yes or no anwers only

No, he will not be re-elected. He never was elected, he was selected by the supreme court. He may be elected this time around, but under no interpretation of election will he be re-elected. Stupid trick questions.

MegaFighter_X · Post by **MegaFighter_X** » 05 Feb 2004 11:46

HELL No

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 05 Feb 2004 13:04

Yes.

I think so because Al'Quaida will do anything possible to keep Bush in power. As long as Bush leads his campaign and war against the middle east or whatever, the Al"Quaida will be happy. And as long as there is a need for that to happen, people are going to vote for Bush based on his strong feelings about war in iraq. The terrorists don't want to rule the west, they want to rule their own countries, and with bush continuing the war with iraq the al'quaida can gain control over the people of their country by "cleansing their soil of americans" or something like that, if you get what I mean.

MegaFighter_X · Post by **MegaFighter_X** » 05 Feb 2004 21:13

I see what you're saying. And that's a very good point... insanely good.. damn..

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 06 Feb 2004 03:21

Thanks.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 06 Feb 2004 03:29

It doesn't really matter. The world is ruled by Saudi Arabia anyway.
I really hope he doesn't become president. I doubt he will be elected in the purist sense of the word - but last time that didn't stop him...

dragonhack · Post by **dragonhack** » 07 Feb 2004 14:10

pill · Post by **pill** » 07 Feb 2004 23:46

i don't think he should and he hopefully wont, but he does have war working in his favor. if we're in the middle of a war people are more likely to keep the same president. i would post more but suddenly i'm tired so i'm going to sleep now

christof · Post by **christof** » 07 Feb 2004 23:52

yes indeed

Dawn Of Freestyle · Post by **Dawn Of Freestyle** » 08 Feb 2004 14:27

From a recent article: Dancing with Dean, Coming Home to Kucinich, by Stephen Dinan OpEdNews.Com

“Creating a winning alternative to Bush is about honoring and celebrating the very virtues that are at the core of the Democrat party and the large mass of progressives who no longer identify with it. It is a philosophy of hope and progress. It is a bold, leading forward into our future. Republicans rule by fear, Democrats lead with hope. Conservatives cling to the past, progressives lean into the future. The visionary torch of the future is what we need more than a burly fighter.
The real problem with the Democrat party, in my opinion, is that it has begun collapsing rightward and "toughening up" out of the inferiority complex created from being out of power at the moment. However, this chisels away at its most enthusiastic and passionate base, the progressive, activist faction that works for our continued evolution as a society.
The winning strategy, I believe, is to choose a candidate who presents the strongest contrast to Bush. Not to be simply anti-Bush, as Dean is, but to stand for an entire platform that is in stark contrast to the welfare-for-the-rich, military build-up, lies, and unilateral aggression that we've been seeing for the last four years. The task is to heighten the difference rather than erase it.
That means using truth more than advertising spin. It means championing those penalized most by Bush's regime. It means being willing to cut the Defense budget and strongly commit America to a path beyond perpetual warfare.
I submit that the candidate who has the MOST viable platform on which to stand to defeat Bush is Dennis Kucinich.”

Unfortunately, the candidate who is now considered the front-runner is Kerry. Kerry does not offer a platform significantly different than Bush’s. In a recent interview Kerry said, "I have fought for my country my whole life. I'm not going to back down now. This is one Democrat who is going to fight back, and I've only just begun to fight.”

If it's a fight to see who's the toughest, it’s going to be a close race. but, if Kucinich gets the nomination in Boston, it will be clear to the people that what we are looking at is a person of very high moral integrity vs. a man who has lied quite blatantly to the American people. I believe a debate between these two men would be devastating to Bush. Just listen to Kucinich, he is brilliant by comparison.

Either way, I'm sure Bush will lose, unless he pulls the same strings he pulled last election. And in that case, we might as well kiss our democracy good-bye

Dawn Of Freestyle · Post by **Dawn Of Freestyle** » 08 Feb 2004 14:54

George bush;

i am luke skywalker.

i come by the full power of the force one way or another and you will loose.

i am obi wan kenobi; you can kill me; but that will only make me stronger.

I am the wave of true understanding alone; centered in one mind;
but in phase with a billion others thoughts in dream

Cut me down dad. If you do i become the Black DRagon.
Or embrace me here and now dad and love yourself as me
enough to know that all i want is for the lies and propagandas to end.

To read more by prometheuspan go to:
http://us.denniskucinich.us/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3324

Dawn Of Freestyle · Post by **Dawn Of Freestyle** » 08 Feb 2004 15:03

Juan · Post by **Juan** » 08 Feb 2004 16:08

yes.

the last 24 years or so, every candidate who has raised the most campaign money the year before the election has won it. i heard this on public radio...W has like $100 million more than any other candidate

Matt · Post by **Matt** » 08 Feb 2004 17:19

They did a study where they took a group of people and showed them video clips every day of a semester of a bunch of teachers teaching, and then at the end of the semester people told their opinions of the teachers.

Then they showed a different group of people a 2 second clip of each teacher and they wrote their opinions. They were much the same

I guess it shows that people had their opinions of the candidates from the very beginning and its not going to change much.
I dont know

Dawn Of Freestyle · Post by **Dawn Of Freestyle** » 08 Feb 2004 18:18

If people are indeed sheep, Bush will win.
I will leave the country.

modified