Now I've seen everything

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 15 Feb 2004 11:39

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1035353.htm

This is BS

Matt · Post by **Matt** » 15 Feb 2004 11:43

Adolf Hitler?? What is going on?

dragonhack · Post by **dragonhack** » 15 Feb 2004 11:51

man if they win the noble peace prize than i should be getting the most un-baised human on this planet award(which we all know isnt true in the slightest)

Panda Licker · Post by **Panda Licker** » 15 Feb 2004 11:55

If they win, or even just get nominated, I'm giving up on the human race entirely

Whatsfootbag? · Post by **Whatsfootbag?** » 15 Feb 2004 12:10

..............................................i hearby give up any hope that i had that the human race iwll make it past 2050....

MegaFighter_X · Post by **MegaFighter_X** » 15 Feb 2004 12:13

Whatsfootbag? wrote: ..............................................i hearby give up any hope that i had that the human race iwll make it past 2050....

I'll quickly second that...

THEY WENT TO WAR! THAT'S NOT PEACE YOU DUMBFUCK FROM NORWAY!!!

I thought it was for peace... There is no peace...

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 15 Feb 2004 12:24

MegaFighter_X wrote:
Whatsfootbag? wrote: ..............................................i hearby give up any hope that i had that the human race iwll make it past 2050....
I'll quickly second that...

THEY WENT TO WAR! THAT'S NOT PEACE YOU DUMBFUCK FROM NORWAY!!!

I thought it was for peace... There is no peace...

MEGAFIGHTER FOR NOBEL PEACE PRIZE!!! HURAAAYYY

LameR · Post by **LameR** » 15 Feb 2004 15:53

Maybe that got peace confused with (blowing things to) pieces.

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 15 Feb 2004 16:09

Hahaha, that actually made me laugh out loud lamer!

SeRiAl ThIlLa~ · Post by **SeRiAl ThIlLa~** » 15 Feb 2004 19:26

I am undecided. Think... maybe if they didnt get rid of him he would start a nuclear war and end the human race? how do we know? and Yes vice versa. Maybe they made a huge mistake and Saddam wouldnt have done anything. But all im concerned with is being safe. So i would rather see him go. I could go on forever about pro's and con's in my opinion aboiut what they did. But im to lazy. And we can't change history so lets just be glad that a "suspected" madman is gone.

brian relly · Post by **brian relly** » 15 Feb 2004 19:30

Why is former Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler up for the nobel peace prize?

dragonhack · Post by **dragonhack** » 15 Feb 2004 20:13

i think its funny that the united states(or bvush himself actually) is going after countrys that have neuclear arms when himself has control of many "wepons of mass destruction" but will not admit it and no one will go after him to check because their either allied with him or they dont want a war started and get the shit blown out of them...but then again it also could be total speculatuion that he has the capabilities of mass destruction...either way hes in the wrong and i totally dissagree with either of them being up for the nobel peace prize they just dont deserve it....bush is a hypochrite in my mind.

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 16 Feb 2004 05:53

SeRiAl ThIlLa~ wrote:I am undecided. Think... maybe if they didnt get rid of him he would start a nuclear war and end the human race? how do we know? and Yes vice versa. Maybe they made a huge mistake and Saddam wouldnt have done anything. But all im concerned with is being safe. So i would rather see him go. I could go on forever about pro's and con's in my opinion aboiut what they did. But im to lazy. And we can't change history so lets just be glad that a "suspected" madman is gone.

It doesn't matter if Saddam did anything wrong or not, the fact of the matter is that Bush is a dumb fuck who leads attacks on other middle eastern countries, killing thousands. Doesn't sound too peacefull to me. Does he organize a covert operation to find, report and disarm the weapons (if they existed)? No, he imediately steps up to the plate and pulls the whole "we are doing this for humanity, and to stop terrorism around the world" bullshit.

Does the means justify the actions?

brian relly · Post by **brian relly** » 16 Feb 2004 06:08

dragonhack wrote:i think its funny that the united states(or bvush himself actually) is going after countrys that have neuclear arms when himself has control of many "wepons of mass destruction" but will not admit it and no one will go after him to check because their either allied with him or they dont want a war started and get the shit blown out of them...but then again it also could be total speculatuion that he has the capabilities of mass destruction...either way hes in the wrong and i totally dissagree with either of them being up for the nobel peace prize they just dont deserve it....bush is a hypochrite in my mind.

Yeah... everyone knows America has nukes. They don't bother to check us because they know we use them responsibly. Bush isn't stupid enough to nuke anyone at this point, because he and everyone else knows it'll get him in some deep shit. America hasn't nuked anyone since WWII; we can be trusted with them...

Mad Hacker: ell oh ell....

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 16 Feb 2004 06:09

Stephen Barnes wrote: Mad Hacker: ell oh ell....

What does that mean? lol

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 16 Feb 2004 06:27

ell oh ell = lol

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 16 Feb 2004 07:11

What was so funny about what I said Stephen?

brian relly · Post by **brian relly** » 16 Feb 2004 08:04

just that you're saying the same thing every other neo-liberal I know does. It gets old and I eventually start laughing at it.

If you don't know what I mean, check out the Axis of Justice forums. They're what made me realize that all of these Armchair Liberals/Conservatives are all complete idiots and I stopped caring about politics/activism.

Axis of Justice <--- fuuunny shit..

edit: I know I'm wording this wrong. Basically I think it's funny when people try and voice their opinions via a lot of insults and curse words and/or overused slogans.

Chris Hanratty · Post by **Chris Hanratty** » 16 Feb 2004 08:13

Okay, so just because I said the word "fuck" when describing Bush, and because I said "bullshit" (because it's a commonly used term that there aren't too many other ways of saying bullshit in a couple words) means that I based my opinion around slang and curse words? And opinion is an opinion, regardless of what terminology that someone uses.

I'm not a neo-liberal, I don't even care about politics that much. If I happen to share an opinion about this the same as those so called neo-liberals, wow... big whooop. I guess that means I'm one of them and now think exactly how they do, huh?

Seems you've got it out for me, it's pretty funny. ell oh ell

P.S. No I'm not reading the axis of justice because I don't care what it says, it has nothing to do with my previous statements except for I'm guessing that they share the same view on something. No need to read it again.

brian relly · Post by **brian relly** » 16 Feb 2004 08:23

I've 'got it out for you' ?

No, that post just bugged me.

This computer puts me in a bad mood. I'm gonna go get some fresh air...

modified

Now I've seen everything

Do you think that Bush & Blair should be nominated or get the prize?

Now I've seen everything