Nuclear detonation

This section is specifically for serious non-footbag debate and discussion.

Which nation/organization will be the first in 50+ years to detonate a nuclear device in war?

United States
14
38%
Great Britain
1
3%
Israel
7
19%
North Korea
6
16%
Iran
0
No votes
India/Pakistan
2
5%
3rd party (Al Qaeda or others)
7
19%
 
Total votes: 37

User avatar
Tsiangkun
Post Master General
Posts: 2855
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 02:27
Location: Oaktown

Post by Tsiangkun »

Bijan wrote: bigoted and jealous because they can't create anything in a 1000 years, so they want to steal or burn what they can never achieve. "
Maybe the last 500 years, but 1000 is too many and shows an American understanding of world history.

You do know how and where Britain aquired the technologies that allowed them to advance out of the dark ages and leap frog all other nations into a position of dominance right ???

Ponder . . . maybe they are not so jealous as they are constantly held in a position of inferiority while they developed the technologies they allowed the western world to flourish. They were the premiere societies, until torn apart by civil wars within Islam, and ultimately divided into groups and crushed by the outsiders.

--Tsiangkun
Bijan
Shredaholic
Posts: 125
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 15:36
Location: Twin Cities

Post by Bijan »

Tsiangsun-Word

Nathan-
Democracy in the middle east has already happened. However it was torn apart by a CIA coup under pressure from Winston Churchill.
It's documented.
Also you seem to harbor mildy racist ideals which you base on rash generalizations. Do you really believe that everyone in the middle east, meaning Turks, Arabs, Persians, Kurds, any many other diverse ethnic groups, are all crazy ass extremists? I really hope not.

Generalizing is the easy way out. It helps you organize things more easily. Unfortunatelly it's usually false. Statistically there are greater personality differences between people of the same ethnic group, Than when two ethnic groups are compared.

The majority of people in the world just want to live a good life, be fed, and have a home. Maybe even get married and start a family without bombs being dropped on their heads.

It's harder, and takes more patience, but is more satisfying when you try to genuinely understand a person, a situation, or even the world itself.
It's much easier to make things up about someplace you've only seen on TV, and generalize as one group although it encompasses a wide variety of ethnic groups.

I've noticed that you are generally an uncredible source of info, and that you kinda get off on pissing people off. Good luck with that.


But let me remind you that just because its a hole that makes noise, doesn't mean you should talk out of it.-Old persian proverb :P
"No wind blows favorably on a ship with no destination..."

Bijan Esnaashari
FlexThis
Post Master General
Posts: 3025
Joined: 14 Nov 2003 16:27
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by FlexThis »

Bijan,

I'm glad you chime in on the forums under this thread. It is important to have a perspective on the situation from someone with first hand information. Often times we do generalize to make a point, or push an idea, but ignorance is ignorance and I applaud your willingness to shed some light on the subject.

The more this war rages on, the less I agree with it. People are just trying to live, and they shouldn't have to fear getting blown up on a trip to the market to buy food.

~peace
Go out and shred already.
~Damon Mathews
waldo wa1do
Circle Kicker
Posts: 2
Joined: 07 May 2004 17:51

Post by waldo wa1do »

a nuclear war will happen not when an insane person gets his hands on a nuke, but when the decision to use nukes becomes the sane choice.
caps BANDIT!
User avatar
HighDemonslayer
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 19:34
Location: Arizona

Post by HighDemonslayer »

Tsiangkun: I don't deny ancient contributions to science and whatnot.


I'm thinking more along the lines of:

"What have you done for me lately?"


I'm not sure who you are implying the Brits stole their knowledge from. Or in what time period.
If you are talking about colonial-period dominance, offhand I would attribute it to having "modern" firearms and the knowledge that citrus would prevent scurrvy on long sea voyages.

Who did they steal those from?

I thought western companies got the oil flowing, and then foolishly gave up the mining rights.


Bijan:
------------------------------------

Oh sob story.


-Democracy was there once, somebody ruined it, so fuck em now.

-Ouch, the race card, how dull. Playing the race card is the laziest way out my friend.

-Of course, I have never said or implied that all or most "people in the middle east" are crazy ass extremists. That was your generalization of me.



I get sick of the platitudes about how most people just want to do right what's right for their families.

No fucking duh!

I don't like watching the helpless masses in shocking poverty ,being used as human shields,so the extreme minority can spend oil dollars crashing planes into our buildings.

-n
Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?


-----------------------------------
-nathan
Bijan
Shredaholic
Posts: 125
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 15:36
Location: Twin Cities

Post by Bijan »

"I get sick of the platitudes about how most people just want to do right what's right for their families. "

I don't give a fuck if you get sick of them, that doesn't make it any less true.

"-Democracy was there once, somebody ruined it, so fuck em now. "

Yeah man, that's a great way to view the world. Just forget about the past. Unfortuanately most people don't just forget their past. They don't have that option, Seeing as they experienced it and didn't read it in a book. But what goes around comes around, and what goes up it must come down.

The US will someday cease to be a superpower.

"-Of course, I have never said or implied that all or most "people in the middle east" are crazy ass extremists. That was your generalization of me."

"Their neighbors are just to bigoted and jealous because they can't create anything in a 1000 years, so they want to steal or burn what they can never achieve. "

\Gen`er*al*i*za"tion\, n. [Cf. F. g['e]n['e]ralisation.] 1. The act or process of generalizing; the act of bringing individuals or particulars under a genus or class; deduction of a general principle from particulars.

See words are used to convey ideas, if you don't understand the meaning of the word you cannot convey your message.

I was observing you and what you have said, and I expressed my interpretation of it. It would be impossible for me to generalize about you, because you are only one person.

"Ouch, the race card, how dull. Playing the race card is the laziest way out my friend."

I am not trying to hurt you, or play some sort of game with you. Life is not a fucking game for me. It's real.


"I don't like watching the helpless masses in shocking poverty ,being used as human shields,so the extreme minority can spend oil dollars crashing planes into our buildings. "

Hey! something we agree on. Now several questions stem from this problem. Such as
Why are the masses in shocking poverty? and why are they crashing planes into our buildings? The questions are just as interrelated as the world itself. Therefore the answers must be also. There is no place in the world completely removed from the rest of it. What we do here affects what happens there. Who we "choose" to lead us, how we consume resources, right down to how we live our lives. It's kind of a scary thought but we all have a responsibility.

I don't really enjoy playing stupid fucking games on a internet forum. So you can reply but I may or may not respond.

"Oh sob story."

And its not a sob story cause the stories never over.

Peace to anyone who genuinly gives a fuck.

Bijan
"No wind blows favorably on a ship with no destination..."

Bijan Esnaashari
Bijan
Shredaholic
Posts: 125
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 15:36
Location: Twin Cities

Post by Bijan »

Oh and back on topic I vote for Nathan.
"No wind blows favorably on a ship with no destination..."

Bijan Esnaashari
User avatar
HighDemonslayer
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 19:34
Location: Arizona

Post by HighDemonslayer »

Bijan wrote:
-------------------------------------
I don't give a fuck if you get sick of them, that doesn't make it any less true.
-------------------------------------

Dumb ass, I know this, everyone knows "most people just want to do right what's right for their families."

It's like telling us that the sky is blue. Don't waste our fucking time.



Just because people are jealous and bigoted doesn't make them a crazy ass extremist.



-n
Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?


-----------------------------------
-nathan
User avatar
wolfpac444
Your Friendly Admin
Posts: 1890
Joined: 24 Mar 2003 00:07

Post by wolfpac444 »

However, one could easily argue that people that are jealuous and bigoted _and_ want to steal or burn what they can never achieve are "crazy ass extremists".
Mike Hansen
User avatar
HighDemonslayer
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 19:34
Location: Arizona

Post by HighDemonslayer »

Yeah , I do see a difference between those who WANT to burn it all down, and those who TRY and DO burn it all down.



-n
Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?


-----------------------------------
-nathan
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

personally I'd call an extremist someone who has radical views and ideas - not held by the majority of people. Or maybe something along the lines of - ideals and morals outside of what is normally accepted by society.

I have a lot of friends who would definitly be defined as extremists politically - but are not jealous, bigoted or want to steal or burn anything down that they can't have (although one of them made national news a year or two ago when he burnt the Australian flag at a demonstration)
FlexThis
Post Master General
Posts: 3025
Joined: 14 Nov 2003 16:27
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by FlexThis »

Nice Quote, is that for real? Sure does clear things up a bit.

On topic:
By your definition Jeremy Gays would be extremists, so would women in muslim countries that want liberty.

Damn that sux!

Also in your definition of the "majority of people in society", would that be 51% of the people? If so, - all the democrats in this country would be extremists.
Go out and shred already.
~Damon Mathews
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

I was actually talking about politcal views and actions - not physical things.

For example while a small population of the Australia is gay, support for gay people or indifference to them is much higher. So clearly they are not extremists. If women in Islamic countries who want liberty is a small minority then maybe they are extremists. I think to add to my definition - extremists have to have the most radical views (or close to).

I think it's fairly unlikely to find a genuine (over 50%) majority of people on an issue. Obviously if you divide the issue into two options you'll find that, but if you let people tell you their personal opinions, I'm sure they'll vary away from a two option view.

Oh and that quote was really said by Ahren. I'm a little sceptical about it being true or not.
User avatar
marc
Multidex Master
Posts: 267
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 18:31
Location: Branchburg, NJ

Post by marc »

Arguments like this one can never be settled.
Marc Reinecker
User avatar
HighDemonslayer
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 19:34
Location: Arizona

Post by HighDemonslayer »

Yeah, extremism depends on who you ask. The more it's used, the less meaningful it becomes.

It's like the word "terrorist". Say it 100 times in a row as fast as you can, and it loses any meaning to you.



"The War on Terror" on it's face, is one of the dumbest names for a war.

Call it what it is, a holy war, than not everyone is participating in.

And while I'm ranting...

Am I the only one who thinks Dept. of Homeland Security is the most lame name for a security apparatus?

They should just rename it:
"Dept. of Wide Open Borders and Inconvenient Air Travel"


Hopefully this post won't start any arguments cuz it's way of topic.

Since this thread is about the nuclear topic, I'll try to modify the poll to add the options I left off.

-n
Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?


-----------------------------------
-nathan
Post Reply