Genesis

ShredPirate · Post by **ShredPirate** » 15 Sep 2004 15:27

i think only toe moves should be able to get xdex

wouldn't THAT fix things??

wicked · Post by **wicked** » 15 Sep 2004 15:30

^^^ true

smpdustin15 · Post by **smpdustin15** » 15 Sep 2004 20:41

there is a system imo of how hard a trick is
ask someone who can hit it and theyll tell you some people
have some tricks that are easy for them like jon and
his super dragons but he would still say yeah thats a hard ass
move and adds kinda do say difficulty like
a one add has one component so it cant be as hard as a 15 add
move cause its out numbered by 14 more components i know theres
exceptions but if you really want to know ask someone say
hey is nemisis harder than pdx drifter its only one more add
and they all laugh and then in a straight face tell you yes its a million times harder

wicked · Post by **wicked** » 15 Sep 2004 20:46

smpdustin15 wrote:...ask someone say
hey is nemisis harder than pdx drifter its only one more add

Na its two more adds bro, but i knowwatchu mean

wolfpac444 · Post by **wolfpac444** » 15 Sep 2004 20:48

Na its three more adds dog ;-]

wicked · Post by **wicked** » 15 Sep 2004 21:19

wolfpac444 wrote:Na its three more adds dog ;-]

How you figure wolfpac? Pdx drifter is a four.. nemesis is only a 6 yo.. Four dexes and a clipper stall. whoever said nemesis was a 7 is on crack.

Tripp · Post by **Tripp** » 16 Sep 2004 04:48

ShredPirate wrote:i think only toe moves should be able to get xdex

wouldn't THAT fix things??

Yes!

C-Fan · Post by **C-Fan** » 16 Sep 2004 15:27

Tripp wrote:
ShredPirate wrote:i think only toe moves should be able to get xdex

wouldn't THAT fix things??
Yes!

That`s 2 people who agree so far, so I feel inclined to chime in. I think pdx atom smasher is just as deserving (of xdex), if not more so, than regular atom smasher. So I disagree.

Edit: I also was under the impression Chris was being sarcastic, but since he got 2 serious replies supporting his view, I felt compelled to throw in my thoughts on the issue.

wolfpac444 · Post by **wolfpac444** » 16 Sep 2004 15:33

Yeah, I disagree as well. The example that came to mind is that 69 is only a 5 without xdex.

Shredster · Post by **Shredster** » 16 Sep 2004 20:31

I think chris was being super sarcastic since he's the god of toe moves

Muffinman · Post by **Muffinman** » 16 Sep 2004 21:05

C-Fan wrote:If Fury is a 6, then genesis is a 7.

And you also say sumo should get xdex. So then if sumo gets xdex shouldn't nuclear same whirl (which doesn't even get paradox for the nuclear) get xdex?

C-Fan · Post by **C-Fan** » 16 Sep 2004 21:15

chan wrote:
C-Fan wrote:If Fury is a 6, then genesis is a 7.
And you also say sumo should get xdex. So then if sumo gets xdex shouldn't nuclear same whirl (which doesn't even get paradox for the nuclear) get xdex?

I don`t follow your train of thought. If I said that pdx tap deserved x-dex, then it would make sense for me to say that nuke same whirl deserves x-dex. But I never said pdx tap gets x-dex, i said pdx atom does. Since pdx atom gets x-dex, nuclear whirl also gets x-dex.

Muffinman · Post by **Muffinman** » 16 Sep 2004 21:32

The mirage and whirl are in the same place in sumo compared to nuclear same whirl as in fury compared to genesis. Anyway, it doesn't matter and I don't want to create any bad vibes that's just my uneducated xdex-ignorant opinion

C-Fan · Post by **C-Fan** » 16 Sep 2004 22:30

No bad vibes at all, I just don`t understand what you`re saying. Just to clarify, when you mean `nuclear same whirl`, do you mean the move where both legs dex and it starts and ends on the same clipper (pdx atomic whirl), or are you talking about pdx tapping whirl?

Muffinman · Post by **Muffinman** » 17 Sep 2004 08:08

Sorry, pdx tapping

FlexThis · Post by **FlexThis** » 17 Sep 2004 11:21

ShredPirate · Post by **ShredPirate** » 17 Sep 2004 11:41

the way damon said it, eg. each leg has to have a complete dex, is how i interpretted eric wulff's emails on the .org list awhile back.

wolfpac444 · Post by **wolfpac444** » 17 Sep 2004 11:47

Except for the fact the he specifically talks about how datw does not get an x-dex and and tatw does.

Tsiangkun · Post by **Tsiangkun** » 17 Sep 2004 11:47

Xdex needs to die.

All issues xdex addresses can be resolved by checking the position of the bag after the previous component in a trick and deciding if the bag is in a position eligible for paradox. Examine the next component and see if it's a paradox component. This theory has gained no momentum, although I think it's much simpler than XDEX.

wolfpac444 · Post by **wolfpac444** » 17 Sep 2004 11:52

Cameron, can you explain how that would work / walk me through the logic of that system with something like atom smasher?