POGO - some clarification on the usage of the terminology

Talk about your big add moves and concepts in here.
Post Reply

read the post then vote: is a frontside symposium blur a

"pogo paradox mirage"
14
74%
or a "pogo blur"
5
26%
 
Total votes: 19

User avatar
Samurai
4square Warrior
Posts: 937
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 23:52
Location: hope
Contact:

POGO - some clarification on the usage of the terminology

Post by Samurai »

Ok a symposium stepping paradox mirage - aka frontside blur aka alpha blur

Is that a pogo blur or a pogo paradox mirage?

So does the term pogo simply act as a modifier that states that the first dex of the move (which happens to be stepping) is symposium - so POGO BLUR

OR

Does pogo mean a symposium stepping set - so POGO PARADOX MIRAGE - whereas pogo blur would be a symposium stepping blur (triple dex)

and futhurmore if it is pogo blur - then why not say pogo anything to mean that the first dex is symposium - ie pogo atomsmaher = frontside symp atom smasher - pogo flurry = symposium furious legover

Its confusing and I need clarification and explanation.

BECAUSE I CAN POGO NOW 8) 8) 8) :D :footbag:
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
User avatar
Tsiangkun
Post Master General
Posts: 2855
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 02:27
Location: Oaktown

Post by Tsiangkun »

pogo paradox mirage.

That other thing leads to nonsense crap like whirring blender for double blender.
User avatar
Allan
Posts: 933
Joined: 30 Aug 2003 20:44
Location: Victoria BC

Post by Allan »

Yeah, I think pogo blur would be a triple dex -- like blurry blur.
User avatar
Samurai
4square Warrior
Posts: 937
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 23:52
Location: hope
Contact:

Post by Samurai »

It's a good thing you are a multi dex master.


SENOR GROMMET THINKS THAT HE CAN HAVE HIS CAKE AND EAT IT TOO.
he thinks that he can say pogo blur to mean alpha blur and pogo voodoo to mean symp stepping voodoo and that its okay because of connotations and that it doesnt matter that its not consistant because he sites that there are other flaws in footbag terminology

WELL... EAT IT SENOR GROMMET! I hope that after this thread you rewrite your brain :)!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A good speech pathologist should not allow such logical fallacies to exist in his conciousness! :wink: :cry: :roll: :D
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
User avatar
ted
Atomsmashasaurus Dex
Posts: 790
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 10:34
Location: CO
Contact:

Post by ted »

Jeremy is a know-nothing ignoramus and you should not have listened to him in the first place.
Theodore Anderson
User avatar
Samurai
4square Warrior
Posts: 937
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 23:52
Location: hope
Contact:

Post by Samurai »

I wouldn't go that far, even in jest hehe because he is very intelligent which is why I called him in the first place because I expected some logic. :?
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
User avatar
Samurai
4square Warrior
Posts: 937
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 23:52
Location: hope
Contact:

Post by Samurai »

notice how the people voting for pogo blur have nothing to say in its support :x
Shreddaily wrote:
Started with sparse low lines, built intensity with rythmic variety, went to 16th note lines in high register, than went to octives, than block chords for my last chorus... If you understood that last sentance than you should be playing music and not checking the internet.
Post Reply