http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v388/ ... _Botsm.gifshredzilla wrote:Sam Macauly's (bluntobje3ct) signature picture is offensive. Would you mind having him remove it please?
Several people have PMed me to ask what “the deal isâ€
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v388/ ... _Botsm.gifshredzilla wrote:Sam Macauly's (bluntobje3ct) signature picture is offensive. Would you mind having him remove it please?
I disagree. The mod team agreed that there was nothing in Sam's signature that violated forum policy. Therefore, there was no reason for him to receive a PM from the mods at all. If Chris had a problem with the sig, and learned that the mods thought it didn't violate forum policy, then he should have pmed sam and asked him to modify it if he wanted to.Moxie wrote: I am sorry that none of us PMed Sam asking him to change it if he was willing to. We didn’t do that, and that’s our mistake..
I'd say they shoulld make a post in the kicking circle or discussion about it. Maybe use a poll to see others opinions. It's important to understand what the problem is. Untill Moxie explained it I had no idea what Chris was upset about or why he was attacking Emily (I still don't understand the last part . . .). The point is, nothing will be accomplished if noone knows why you're upset.Iron Clad Ben wrote: If a situation like this comes up, and the moderators don't agree with you, what should you do? What's an appropriate way to publicly bring up your concerns?
Make a thread about it in the Discussion section. Explain why you feel the way you do and what happened when you brought it up to the moderating staff.Iron Clad Ben wrote:If a situation like this comes up, and the moderators don't agree with you, what should you do? What's an appropriate way to publicly bring up your concerns?
he expected that everyone would have to agree with how right he was, and that he would get exactly what he wants, because he deserves it. You think that kind of thing when you're delusional.Iron Clad Ben wrote:I'm trying to seperate in my mind the behavior from the person because Chris is normally a good guy. This was terribly inappropriate. 2 wrongs don't make a right. What outcome was he expecting?
you don't need a character assassination when someone commits character suicide.I'd appreciate if this topic didn't turn into a character assassination of Chris.
As various mods advised Chris, we were about to post the guidelines which can now be found in the discussion section, and that would make the perfect place to discuss the very issue he was concerned about (which is also being discussed in its own thread in the discussion forum).If a situation like this comes up, and the moderators don't agree with you, what should you do? What's an appropriate way to publicly bring up your concerns?
Bing, bang, and also, boom.Matt Cross wrote: you don't need a character assassination when someone commits character suicide