New Vegas Attraction, Hunting for Bambi (X-rated)

MegaFighter_X · Post by **MegaFighter_X** » 17 Jul 2003 18:05

Hey. As I said last night, I wanted to watch right wing news at 5 AM. I turn on "Fox and Friends," a hardcore bunch of fucknuts to watch and argue with when you are chowing on Del Taco before bed. Anyways, Vegas has a new thing to do. "Hunt for Bambi."

This "hunt" isn't with any cute and cuddly forest creatures. It's with cute and cuddly naked women. And the hunt is carried out with paintball guns. There is apparently a "no above the shoulders shot" rule, which is good.

Also, it was told that you can put regulators on the gun, so the paintball doesn't contact with as much force as it does. I don't know about the validity of that, but if that's the case, cool.

The cost per play: $5,000 - $10,000

I want to know your opinions on this little thing. Mine are below.

Sure, it's contoversial. Sure, it's dangerous. Sure, it may be demoralizing women. But it's not as if they are being forced out there to try and not be shot. The women are going out there on their own free will. I don't see a problem with that, honestly. If they choose to go out and run away from people shooting them with paintballs, FINE! Let them be the ones with welts (I imagine it's still possible even with the regulator.). It's good money too. $1000 to the lady if she's hit, $2500 if not. Good deal.

Also, one of the people on the show asked if when the girls are hit if the person who hit them can fuck them (except all politically correct and stuff, of course). I thought that was just god damned ignorant. It's an attraction, not a porn session!

Then, the Bush loving chick on the show asked about if she feels it's demeaning to her, stuff like that. The woman being interviewd from the place (Starla I think the name was) said no. She was getting paid to be shot at, and she was having fun. The Bush chick then said something along the lines of "People also are paid to be beaten and stuff too." It just goes to show if someone is ignorant on fox news, they will fight for their beliefs regardless of how absurd the sound.

QuantumBalance · Post by **QuantumBalance** » 17 Jul 2003 23:46

im glad that no matter how many people hate it, they are still able to do it, cause they want to.. so ha ha to all the poeple that wish they wouldnt

ha ha in your FACE!

MJK · Post by **MJK** » 18 Jul 2003 00:58

I feel bad for the girls, but it is their choice. Sounds fun!

MegaFighter_X · Post by **MegaFighter_X** » 18 Jul 2003 01:12

But do you really have to feel bad for them? I mean, they are going out there, naked, on their own free will to let old horny bastards take potshots at them. They think it's fun. I'll feel sorry for the one that gets heat stroke or something <shrugs> I dunno...

also, look at it this way. Those girls are also able to get rid of a lot more body heat than the guys in the full jungle (another thing, why jungle?)cameos buttoned up and sleeves down. So they have a cooler job then the hunters... And because they are stupid people, they will likely pass out from heat stroke.

ImaginaryDemons · Post by **ImaginaryDemons** » 18 Jul 2003 09:10

I bet some fuck-face will try and rape the women.

Matt · Post by **Matt** » 18 Jul 2003 09:35

i want to be a woman

MJK · Post by **MJK** » 18 Jul 2003 14:04

Man, if I were a woman, I'd have a mirror and some KY jelly and never leave home!

MegaFighter_X · Post by **MegaFighter_X** » 18 Jul 2003 14:12

ImaginaryDemons wrote:I bet some fuck-face will try and rape the women.

It wouldn't be surprising. Hopefully there are some sort of countermeasures against that... Such as person from the office goes with them or something like that... I don't know all the specific details.

Panda Licker · Post by **Panda Licker** » 18 Jul 2003 14:35

I myself am missing the problem. If these women arent being forced into doing this, and are being paid, then its their choice. And if there are men (and manly women

) that want to pay insane amounts of money to shoot fake bullets and naked chicks, then thats fine too. As long as the target women arent fat. Thats bad for two reasons...

Reason 1: Makes them too easy to hit
Reason 2: I for one, dont want to watch fat naked girls run

MegaFighter_X · Post by **MegaFighter_X** » 18 Jul 2003 15:54

Exactally my point.

MJK · Post by **MJK** » 18 Jul 2003 16:20

Exactally my point.

Exactly his point.[/quote]

Spadrick · Post by **Spadrick** » 25 Jul 2003 11:06

What a sick-headed world we live in.

max · Post by **max** » 25 Jul 2003 14:48

What a sick-headed world we live in.

this doesn't exactly happen all over the world

carl winslow · Post by **carl winslow** » 25 Jul 2003 19:16

this isnt a big deal considering prostitiution is legal in a few counties in vegas.

Panda Licker · Post by **Panda Licker** » 25 Jul 2003 19:20

did u see how much they get payed. if they run around for 2 hours, and dont get hit, they get $2,500 and if they get hit, they get $1000. hell, i'd do it too

HackingGanesh · Post by **HackingGanesh** » 25 Jul 2003 20:26

in 2 hours time, what are the odds of not getting hit?

Panda Licker · Post by **Panda Licker** » 25 Jul 2003 20:29

still, for a grand? and if uve been doing it long enuff, u'd get good at hiding your supple naked body.....

perry ellis · Post by **perry ellis** » 25 Jul 2003 20:58

whith apesuits on it wouldnt hurt to much then you still
get to have fun with soemeones mommie.

chestnut127 · Post by **chestnut127** » 04 Aug 2003 10:31

matt, you are scaring me

Rob · Post by **Rob** » 04 Aug 2003 10:56

I think it's fine. If they want to do it, let them.

This isn't x-rated in any way.

modified

New Vegas Attraction, Hunting for Bambi (X-rated)

What do you think "Hunting for Bambi?" Please reply with some commentary.

New Vegas Attraction, Hunting for Bambi (X-rated)