Online Sick 3 competition

Footbag videos and footbag related videos such as takraw, freestyle soccer, etc.

Should there be an open competition or 1-on-1 challenge?

Open competition
37
70%
One-on-One challenge
8
15%
One-on-One challenge
8
15%
 
Total votes: 53

User avatar
ebo
Unexplained Bacon
Posts: 2235
Joined: 06 Aug 2003 15:59
Location: Munich, Germany
Contact:

Online Sick 3 competition

Post by ebo »

I just had an idea, after watching Ian's sick 3 video:

What about an online sick 3 contest? Post a video of your best sick3,
and every week or so there'll be a contest - where the people of
modified can vote for their favourite combo.

What do you think?
Last edited by ebo on 26 Oct 2004 11:19, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Anz
Anssi Sundberg
Posts: 3007
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 12:02
Location: Finland, Turku

Post by Anz »

YES!

Good idea Bjoern!
User avatar
mosher
brutal footbag cronie
Posts: 6177
Joined: 22 Jan 2004 23:30
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Contact:

Post by mosher »

I think that overall add value should NOT reign supreme since we are all at various levels.
Tom Mosher

hate is a waste of passion!
mc
Modifiend
Posts: 7628
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 15:16
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Post by mc »

maybe we could do it like duels. like, challenge someone who you feel is at your level to an online sick 3 video duel. that would be rad.
BRICK!

rfa::never give up::
nyfa
User avatar
Posi-Cole
Atomsmashasaurus Dex
Posts: 992
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 22:39
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Posi-Cole »

matthewl329 wrote:maybe we could do it like duels. like, challenge someone who you feel is at your level to an online sick 3 video duel. that would be rad.
That's an incredible idea.
Cole Hobson
Muffinman
the gimp
Posts: 10375
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 15:34
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Muffinman »

Or we could group levels so that there could be more than two people competing against each other -- this would make it more like an actual competition.
User avatar
mosher
brutal footbag cronie
Posts: 6177
Joined: 22 Jan 2004 23:30
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Contact:

Post by mosher »

I like that idea too.

But how would groupings be organized? and how is sandbagging avoidable?
Tom Mosher

hate is a waste of passion!
david
Senor Buttercup
Posts: 2479
Joined: 28 Aug 2003 09:37
Location: San Carlos, CA

Post by david »

i think its avoidable by havign a general concensus of peoples skills, honesty, and having a few people who would "sort" the combos.
david
User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

great idea!

I think the best thing to do would be to have an open competition - so anybody can enter and the best combo wins!

We could also have an intermediate competition - and people who's combos are too good get flamed after every post until they quit footbag and never play again :P

Actually I'm not sure - we could just go on an honesty thing - so if you post your combo in the intermediate section thats where you get judged - regardless of if you should be in open or not. But then the next competition (did we say one a week?) you have to compete open - we could say anybody who does a really good combo in the intermediate comp (fearless level - not neccessarily fearless but that difficulty) goes up a level next time and anybody who wins intermediate twice in a row also goes up to open.

We don't want too many divisions or there will be too many winners and it will lose it's meaning.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Rad idea.

I might be able to get a video up over the weekend.
User avatar
ebo
Unexplained Bacon
Posts: 2235
Joined: 06 Aug 2003 15:59
Location: Munich, Germany
Contact:

Post by ebo »

Good suggestions. I like the duel idea, however it limits the input
of awesome sick3 videos :)

I think there should be 2 sections - intermediate and open, depending
on the level of play you're at. if you're already guiltless, don't dare to
compete in intermediate!

Let the combos roll!
User avatar
ShredPirate
Punkass
Posts: 1090
Joined: 03 May 2003 15:57
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by ShredPirate »

i'm gonna be competing intermediate. ok?
Chris Pinkus
User avatar
Colin
Flower Child
Posts: 1698
Joined: 05 Jul 2002 13:28
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Contact:

Post by Colin »

An online Sick 3 ladder?

Mmmm...
Colin Kennedy
[email protected]
Guest

Post by Guest »

ShredPirate wrote:i'm gonna be competing intermediate. ok?
Nope.
User avatar
ebo
Unexplained Bacon
Posts: 2235
Joined: 06 Aug 2003 15:59
Location: Munich, Germany
Contact:

Post by ebo »

ShredPirate wrote:i'm gonna be competing intermediate. ok?
are you tiltless already? I hear you're working on clippers.
User avatar
Fu Xi
Hybrid
Posts: 446
Joined: 03 May 2003 16:10
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Fu Xi »

i'm in
Rob Johnson
Rob Fuller + Brian Johnson = Rob "Hybrid" Johnson

Its a long story, but they aren't my parents
User avatar
Sergey
Egyptian Footgod
Posts: 1138
Joined: 14 Dec 2002 10:48
Location: Moscow, Russia
Contact:

Post by Sergey »

Me too (I hope Cole too), it's a great idea!
Sergey Pikalov
User avatar
Shredster
Flower Child
Posts: 1532
Joined: 14 Nov 2003 00:19
Location: Medford, OR
Contact:

Post by Shredster »

I'm in :)

I think i'll try a 5>4>5 :) OR a 6>4>5...who knows.

And Pinkus, if you compete in intermediate, that means i'm competing in "just starting"
Chris May
Image
Paradox=((5N^x^p)-54000aph^np)/adds
Its just about that confusing...
User avatar
Posi-Cole
Atomsmashasaurus Dex
Posts: 992
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 22:39
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Posi-Cole »

I have a grandiose idea for how I think this should work in a 'head to head' format.. Hear me out.

First, I think it should be divided into three divisions, Novice, Intermediate and Open. 3 Divisions simply because people who are just starting and learning to link 2 adds should be allowed to compete as well and it would stop such occurences as someone who has been playing for 3 months posting butterfly > pdx mirage > Around the World and having no chance against someone else who does fall under intermediate but hits ripwalk > ripwalk > spinning butterfly. Anyway, just an example.

Anyway, here's how I think it should work ....

People assign themselves to whatever skill level they see fit, and stickied at the top of that forum there would be a list of all the people who are a part of that division and have video capabilities and are able to upload a video within a reasonable amount of time, as well, it would have IM contact info for everyone and whatnot.

Then, after there is a reasonable amount of people within each division, people could go to the "Sick 3 Challenge Forum" and begin to find people similar in skill to themselves who they can challenge to a Sick 3 competition. Once both players agree on the challenge they can also take as long or as little time as they need to come up with their sick 3 video. Once one combatant finishes his video he would send a PM to whoever the mod of this Sick 3 Challenge forum is that says simply (as an example):

"I have challenged Ryan Seath to a Sick 3 Challenge, my video is posted at http://shredvideoaddresshere.com"

Once the mod receives the second PM from the second partcipant in the battle (which should be closely followed by the first video sent in, the combatants should agree on an appx time length to get their video in), the mod will post the URL's for both videos in a STICKIED thread, and have a simple 2 option poll, asking which sick 3, based on creativity, trick difficulty and style is the best. The polls will run for a set amount of time (A week probably) and then once the polls are closed the thread will be locked, and the winner will be the one with the most votes.

This is why I believe that the mod should handle all the posting of polls and whatnot - It will keep things in the forum a lot cleaner and more organized, and make it so the people voting know how to easily find the threads with videos, and don't have to wade through a pile of senseless posts from other people to find where to vote. It would be cool if it could be simply made so only the mod could start topics in the forum, but others could reply, so people didn't just robotically vote, they could voice their opinion, ie. "I would have given it to Shredder A, but the dex on his pdx whirl looked a bit thing, so Shredder B gets my vote". Stuff like that.

Within a skill division, stats can be kept on Wins and Loss(person who has the most votes after a week of voting gets a win for the week and vice versa) and "points" can be used to break any ties in win loss record, a point simply being total number of votes for a persons sick 3. This will create a fun ladder system and give people some fun bragging rights as well as an idea of who to challenge next.

To avoid sandbagging as mentioned before it could be made a rule that if a competitor wins 5 straight matchups he must advance to the next level, or likewise if a competitor loses 5 straight matchups he must drop down a level. Or someone could be promoted if a lot of people agreed it was necessary.

I think it would also be ultra cool if people refrained from showing their opponents the videos and stuff before they were actually posted for voting. That would remove someone finding out that their counterpart hit whatever combo and therefore their initial sick 3 isn't good enough, and they spend time trying to hit something new. This would cut down on a lot of wasted time I think and keep things moving.

Other small rules would include people not being able to post the same combo twice. This would prevent someone from just hitting one huge sick 3 and riding it all the way to the top. It will also keep the number of fresh videos we can get to see up. On top of that, hopefully it will promote people just filming a whole lot of sick 3's throughout the course of the session and then just having them 'on reserve' to use against whomever they challenge or who challenges them. This would also add another cool element in that people who have a bunch of Sick 3's saved up would have to contemplate how huge their opponent is going to go and pick which of their sick 3's to use accordingly.

Also, we could also have a small rule that the combo has to be shown in real time and then in slow mo in the video, so people can better judge the cleanliness of the tricks. But that's more nitty gritty that can be worked out if people decide they like this idea.

Anyway, forum wise, what I think would work best would be 4 new forums. 1 for each division where the voting polls are placed, and one for people to find people challenge/talk generally about the format.

Sound like a good idea? Did I explain it clearly enough? I'd be glad to clear anything up.

Does it sound like a lot of work? Maybe, but I don't think it would be ... And I would be more than happy to take on the role of keeping everything organized and being the Mod of the forum if no one else was keen on doing it. In fact, even if someone did want to do it, I would still want to help/be a part of it - I love that type of organizational stuff :) The idea could fall flat on its face, and if so, no real harm done. However, if done correctly, I have visions of greatness for this idea and it could really bring some new life to modified. I really hope people like it .. Please give me your thoughts, and bring up any questions you may have ...
Cole Hobson
User avatar
qphox
Bullshit Detector
Posts: 2894
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 07:20
Location: Vancouver, BC

Post by qphox »

"I have challenged Ryan Seath to a Sick 3 Challenge, my video is posted at http://shredvideoaddresshere.com"
That was the only line I read because the rest of it looked too intimidating, and the bright blue link caught my attention.

I just wanted to let you know that the link is broken.


:wink:

Sounds like a plan. A large plan, but a plan that could work.
- Kevin R.

F = G*((m1*m2)/r^2)

Know thy enemy.
Post Reply