Pogo - Symp or not?

Talk about your big add moves and concepts in here.

Pogo - Symposium or not?

Symposium but no add
21
50%
Symposium with an add
14
33%
NOT symposium
7
17%
 
Total votes: 42

User avatar
Jeremy
"Really unneccesary"
Posts: 10178
Joined: 08 Jan 2003 00:20
Location: Tasmania

Post by Jeremy »

ok I just tried some pogo stuff and here are my thoughts.

If you hit it cleanly it definitly deserves a symposium add. However I wouldn't call it clean unless the bag has completely left the setting foot before the dexing foot has even left the ground. So hitting the set you actually need to see the bag coming up away from your setting foot before you even try and dex it. Anything else is too close to being slurry to count.
User avatar
Splint
Angry Hippy
Posts: 2095
Joined: 27 Oct 2003 13:58

Post by Splint »

Tsiangkun wrote:SO, pogo IS a slurry trick. I guess the reason you don't see more of it is because slurry is generally a bad thing.

It's like a half assed reverse hop over where you don't keep the bag on the foot through the whole trick combined with a half assed blur set where the bag is set before the dex.
Now we're speaking the same language. :wink:
Old Skool
User avatar
Tsiangkun
Post Master General
Posts: 2855
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 02:27
Location: Oaktown

Post by Tsiangkun »

yeah, that should read half assed blur set where the bag is dexed before the set.
ericksonj
Atomsmashasaurus Dex
Posts: 809
Joined: 26 Jul 2003 04:02
Location: Eugene, OR

Post by ericksonj »

shreddaily wrote:hunt milfs not adds

No shit!

Full sidewalk... lol

pogo is not symposium and also is not even remotely hard enough to deserve another add.
Always Shreddin
James Erickson
Eugene Footbag Association (Orton, Nasty, Me)
w/ new additions (Casey, Alex, Eddie, and Shawnell)
User avatar
Tsiangkun
Post Master General
Posts: 2855
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 02:27
Location: Oaktown

Post by Tsiangkun »

Full sidewalk is hard as hell, and anyone who says otherwise is either really really really good, or hitting the trick with no respect for what the elements of the the trick should be.

You need a clean symposium step, and a big symposium butterfly to hit that trick cleanly. A symposium butterfly with the bag lower than the knee at the start of the trick is %*&$(&^
User avatar
Flipsider
BSOS Beast
Posts: 397
Joined: 13 Jan 2003 19:36
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Contact:

Post by Flipsider »

Pogo is Symposium. The only problem with the add system is that people attempt to force it to *always equate* difficulty. Sometimes it matches, and sometimes it does not. People should just learn the difference and shut up.
Tsiangkun wrote:This whole discussion is just more BS about a system designed to count move components being inconsistently modified to reflect difficulty. Of course the dexes are symposium.
Yes. Exactly.
Splint wrote:Pogo is not symposium... ever. The reason being that You pull through on a Pogo (majorly slurry). If you don't then it's not a Pogo.
I don't know who "You" is, but I do Symposium Stepping (aka. Pogo) nice and clean, and thus disprove your ignorant theory that Pogo means Slurry.
Splint wrote:That's all well and good Cameron, but 99.9% of Pogos are slurred.
I have personally done enough Pogos in the past few months to tip that ridiculous figure by at least 10%. There's no reason to let a few, or even many players ruin a perfectly good move component. What if 9 out of 10 players 'the'ed Double Down? Should we argue that the second dex is really only half a dex and shouldn't "get" 2 dex adds? "Sorry, Barfly isn't *that* much harder than Butterfly, and 99.9% of people 'the' it, so it doesn't 'get' 4 adds." Goddamnit, adds are adds! Some 5s are harder than others. Some 4s are harder than some 6s. Shut up about what "gets" how many adds, and apply adds as they were meant to be applied!

I've been hitting Frontside Ripwarrior (just hit it flip, too!) really clean for a while, and if anyone says it's 5 adds and not much harder than regular Ripwarrior, then they don't know what they are talking about.

The fact that we have asked the shred contest to depend on the add system to perfectly equal difficulty for each individual move isn't the fault of the add system, it's the fault of the shred contest.


Later,
Ellis Piltz
Flipsider, The New.
User avatar
C-Fan
Rekordy Polski
Posts: 11366
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 23:51
Location: Denver
Contact:

Post by C-Fan »

Ellis is correct.
User avatar
slapdash21
Futureless
Posts: 4681
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 14:50
Location: Beantown, kidd

Post by slapdash21 »

Flipsider wrote:I don't know who "You" is, but I do Symposium Stepping (aka. Pogo) nice and clean, and thus disprove your ignorant theory that Pogo means Slurry.
so offense, just curious...video?

EDIT-i realized despite my 'no offense' this still sounds offensive, like im challenging ellis, which im not, im honestly just interested to see how clean a pogo can be, and what must be physically done to accomplish this, etc.
Pete Bowler
B$C
keeps it offah da ground.

617 FOR LIFE
User avatar
kaos
Fearless
Posts: 557
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 01:08
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Contact:

Post by kaos »

In Blitz n the Hood (posted in this thread) Ellis hits alot of pogo's. (For instance, at around 02:09 he hits pogo butterfly > pogo pdx mirage)

_________________

Kobus Brümmer
__________________

"I'd rather write code to write code than write code."
User avatar
Jdigges
Flower Child
Posts: 1704
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 19:23
Location: Ballston Lake NY

Post by Jdigges »

i voted SYMP but no add. I find it just as easy to do a pogo blur or blur. It really is a symp dex, but it is extremely easy to slur it. In some cases i might say give it an add, such as if you did a full symp blur or blizzard and did not slur the pogo.
Josiah Digges


Embassy Footbag Crew
Post Reply