Have you been watching any football at all this season, I disagree, the bears are going to be destroyed either way because the AFC is a much stronger and tougher than the NFC. I think that the bears have been overated and dont have a shot in the superbowl.fatbagger wrote:
I am now officially jumping on the chicago band waggon, If Indy can beat the patriots I think chicago will win the big one. They won't beat the Patriots.
Actually, the Patriot's defense was probably better than the Bear's, seeing as that was the strength of their team this year, and all year long they have played against offenses 10x better than anything the Bear's saw. You still might be right though, but I still expect the Colt's to ass in on the Cub's I mean Bear's. A lot depend on how good the Bear's run defense is against Addai and Rhodes, because if they have good games then Peyton, Reggie and Marvin are just going to stretch the field like a rubber band.Whats that they say . . .?
A good defense will never win against a good offense? er . . um?
Colts= good offense, poor defense.
Chicago=not sure, not sure
result: Bears whoop Colts' asses because a good passing game cannot exist in the midst of a good defense. It has been proven time and time again. If the bears have a defense, they will win.
Okay that was probably one of the most retarded things i've heard all week.BainbridgeShred wrote:Actually, the Patriot's defense was probably better than the Bear's, seeing as that was the strength of their team this year, and all year long they have played against offenses 10x better than anything the Bear's saw. You still might be right though, but I still expect the Colt's to ass in on the Cub's I mean Bear's. A lot depend on how good the Bear's run defense is against Addai and Rhodes, because if they have good games then Peyton, Reggie and Marvin are just going to stretch the field like a rubber band.
If you watched the Colts/pats game, iunno if ya noticed but the kickoffs after the half the Pats returned for 80 yds once, and an average of 40 for the rest of the game. You know who the Bears have? The man, the myth, the rookie legend Devin Hester.Plus, you know who the Colt's have! Most clutch kicker in the history of the NFL. Yes, yes, the man, the myth, the legend, Vinateri.
Special teams isn't defense buddy, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. And also, you're wrong anyways, the Pat's specical teams definitely did win a game this year with their new rookie kicker. And as far as their defense not winning them games, they only gave up more than 21 points a single time the entire regular season, so it's clear you have no idea what you're talking about. And besides, like I said, statistically the Pat's were only one place behind Chicago in defense, playing, for the final time, IN THE TOUGHER DIVISION.1.Iunno what youre on, but i dont think the Pat's defense has ever won a game(including Special teams). Solid D, but only two players that really stand out, Asante Samuel, and Bruschi. Bears have Urlacher, Briggs, Anderson, Tank Johnson , Alex Brown, Tillman, R. Manning, the list goes on. 27 forced fumbles compared to NE's 14. Bears gave up a few more rush yards, but no biggie.
it kinda seems like youre just taking what i said and put it in the words of a 10 year old AFC fan/Bear hater.
Dude, I spent 4 years of my life in Downer's Grove, outside of Chicago, and I have the Blackhawks and Bulls apparell to prove it. The fact is, the Bear's have always been lame, and they're going to drop it during the big show.Kinda harsh, but i only let Chicagoans insult their own team.
BainbridgeShred wrote:Who did the Pat's play? Here's a list:
Jets, Bronco's, Bengal's, Colt's, Bear's (Where they won by the way), Jaguar's and Titan's. All team's at or above 500. Who have the Pat's beaten? Here's another list: Jet's, Bengal's, Bear's, Jaguar's, Titan's and Charger's.
How about the Bears victories? Really only against Seattle (Who was only ok this year), New Orlean's, Jet's, and Giants (Like that even counts as a quality team).
Dude, I spent 4 years of my life in Downer's Grove, outside of Chicago, and I have the Blackhawks and Bulls apparell to prove it. The fact is, the Bear's have always been lame, and they're going to drop it during the big show.
Like Freestyler said, Superbowls are usually won in long stretches by one or the other division, and this is the way it's been since the '73 merger, so really it's clear that you don't know what you're talking about.I really dont think that divisions really matter,
Teams, some of which are better than others, or have you never played sports?You cant say that AFC is better cause a division is made up of teams
No, that's never what I said, and isn't the reason the AFC is a better division. Trust me dude, I'm an NFC fan more than I am an AFC fan (Who is a fan of a conference anyways?) so it's not like I'm just talking shit here.your just saying the AFC is a tougher division because it has a few more winning teams than the NFC
I now know why no one likes you.BainbridgeShred wrote:That's fine, run along to another thread.
And don't apologize to me for trying to sound "harsh". I'm the fucking king of harsh. And when it comes to Football, I know what the fuck I'm talking about. Say something I said is retarded again and next time I'm in Downer's Grove I'll seek you out and burn your house down.
As a matter of fact I played football(year ago, imma play when the season restarts), was a starting DE, I wanted DT but I need some more weight.have you never played sports?
