Crossbody doof? (Nope, it's scary monster!)
-
Mathochist
- Multidex Master
- Posts: 278
- Joined: 24 Dec 2004 05:21
- Location: Around the world
Crossbody doof? (Nope, it's scary monster!)
Here's something I've been toying with. Since I can't hit doof, I can at least attempt the position and then wrap the bent ankle behind the support leg into what I believe to be a crossbody position, in a sort of outside monster.
Some questions for the forum:
Is it crossbody?
Who else has hit it?
In the admittedly unlikely event I hit this first, is it an invention/do I get to name it? (If so, it's "dragoon".)
Otherwise, what's it called?
A pic and a vid for your discernment:
http://www.footbag.org/gallery/show/13451
http://www.footbag.org/gallery/show/13452
The video quality is less than ideal so I included the pose pic.
What do you think?
Some questions for the forum:
Is it crossbody?
Who else has hit it?
In the admittedly unlikely event I hit this first, is it an invention/do I get to name it? (If so, it's "dragoon".)
Otherwise, what's it called?
A pic and a vid for your discernment:
http://www.footbag.org/gallery/show/13451
http://www.footbag.org/gallery/show/13452
The video quality is less than ideal so I included the pose pic.
What do you think?
Last edited by Mathochist on 26 Dec 2007 09:36, edited 1 time in total.
My favorite trick is knowing when to pass.
Rob Creel III

Rob Creel III
- Outsider
- Ayatollah of Rock n' Rollah
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: 21 May 2003 21:30
- Location: Bridgewater, New Jersey
Yep, its called Scary Monster.
Nope, I've never really hit it. Not to my satisfaction anyway.
Think about it for a second: with some move elements, you can obvious do more than a single example of that element in a given trick. You can do a single DEX, or a double DEX. You can do a single BODY element, or a double BODY element (like a double spin, for instance). With some move elements, though, this would seem to never apply. How could you have a single move that had mutiple delays? Or a single move that had multiple unusual surfaces? Or a single move that had multiple cross-body elements? I don't know, but I think Scary Monster kind of approaches an answer to that very last question... You've got to wrap your leg across your body in front of your leg (wouldn't ordinarily count as a cross-body, I know) but then bring the same leg across the body again behind the support leg. That one stalling leg goes in front of then behind the support leg. Across in front, and then across behind.
I used to try to practice this, and quickly gave up when my knee started hurting. Very nice job, Creel. Keep it up, make it smoother, more consistent. Own it. Hit it at random in the middle of a string of shuffle-moves and blow some minds. But not if your knee starts to hurt.
Nope, I've never really hit it. Not to my satisfaction anyway.
What some of you may be missing from the video and picture is (if I am not mistaken) which way his head is pointed when doing this. In the photo, for instance, its over (or under) his right arm. If the same applies, then in the video, he'd be looking over (or under) his left arm. In my opinion, this particular body position is BEYOND cross-body. I've often thought that a stall like that should perhaps be thought of as a DOUBLE CROSS-BODY.Max Power wrote:It is not cross body, i know that.
Think about it for a second: with some move elements, you can obvious do more than a single example of that element in a given trick. You can do a single DEX, or a double DEX. You can do a single BODY element, or a double BODY element (like a double spin, for instance). With some move elements, though, this would seem to never apply. How could you have a single move that had mutiple delays? Or a single move that had multiple unusual surfaces? Or a single move that had multiple cross-body elements? I don't know, but I think Scary Monster kind of approaches an answer to that very last question... You've got to wrap your leg across your body in front of your leg (wouldn't ordinarily count as a cross-body, I know) but then bring the same leg across the body again behind the support leg. That one stalling leg goes in front of then behind the support leg. Across in front, and then across behind.
I used to try to practice this, and quickly gave up when my knee started hurting. Very nice job, Creel. Keep it up, make it smoother, more consistent. Own it. Hit it at random in the middle of a string of shuffle-moves and blow some minds. But not if your knee starts to hurt.
"The time has come to convert the unbelievers..."
Jonathan Schneider --- sometimes showers with his Lavers on (to clean them)
The Ministry of Silly Walks
NYFA
BAP
Jonathan Schneider --- sometimes showers with his Lavers on (to clean them)
The Ministry of Silly Walks
NYFA
BAP
Yessir that's a Scary Monster alright. That's ooooolllllddddd sssccchhhooolll. Kenny Shults invented it way back in the day. I saw him hit it so nicely back at CSS2. He hit it straight to a stall and stopped though. I like how you get it to flow.
It's not cross-body per se. Keep in mind though that when you are talking about cross-body you are talking about a "body" movement that adds difficulty. So while Scary Monster isn't cross-body it is a body movement that adds difficulty.
It's not cross-body per se. Keep in mind though that when you are talking about cross-body you are talking about a "body" movement that adds difficulty. So while Scary Monster isn't cross-body it is a body movement that adds difficulty.
Old Skool
-
footjam_heger
- Egyptian Footgod
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: 25 Sep 2004 11:18
- Location: the world and europe
- Contact:
-
Mathochist
- Multidex Master
- Posts: 278
- Joined: 24 Dec 2004 05:21
- Location: Around the world
Yuh huh!
Thank you, Splint, for answering the "who's hit it?" question. I mean, if it was named then someone has to have hit it, and I really wanted to know who.Splint wrote:Yessir that's a Scary Monster alright. That's ooooolllllddddd sssccchhhooolll. Kenny Shults invented it way back in the day. I saw him hit it so nicely back at CSS2. He hit it straight to a stall and stopped though. I like how you get it to flow.
It's not cross-body per se. Keep in mind though that when you are talking about cross-body you are talking about a "body" movement that adds difficulty. So while Scary Monster isn't cross-body it is a body movement that adds difficulty.
My thoughts on crossbodiness:
What defines crossbody is that the delay foot is not in front of but behind the support leg. This is clearly the case in both clipper and scary monster. Suppose without loss of generality that I catch the footbag on my right foot. In clipper form, my right leg would pass behind the left leg in the natural way. In scary monster form, my right leg would pass behind the left leg from the other direction, going the long way around. They are both crossbody. QED
Jon's comments had me consider this from another angle (ha!). I don't think it counts as double crossbody any more than inspinning counts as double spinning. Just as inspinning is harder than spinning in the gyro direction, scary monster is harder than clipper, but not enough so to merit another add.
Thank you all very much for the props. It means a good deal for me as an intermediate type shredder to get such recognition. I'll see if I can get some video soon that shows where my head looks to clear up any confusion.
My favorite trick is knowing when to pass.
Rob Creel III

Rob Creel III