Talk about your big add moves and concepts in here.
wolfpac444
Your Friendly Admin
Posts: 1890 Joined: 24 Mar 2003 00:07
Post
by wolfpac444 » 11 Dec 2003 07:13
I was having a discussion about this a few days ago. I guess I'll just start it out simple, and we can go from there.
Does toe swirling paradox/far whirl get the paradox add despite the common thinking that paradox moves need to set from clipper?
Mike Hansen
ted
Atomsmashasaurus Dex
Posts: 790 Joined: 12 Sep 2002 10:34
Location: CO
Contact:
Post
by ted » 12 Dec 2003 09:47
No!?!
You people are sick!
Do you realize how much of a hip pivot toe swirling>far component is?
SO HARD.
Theodore Anderson
wolfpac444
Your Friendly Admin
Posts: 1890 Joined: 24 Mar 2003 00:07
Post
by wolfpac444 » 12 Dec 2003 13:54
Anyone who voted "No" care to explain why?
Mike Hansen
jhibbs
Shredaholic
Posts: 197 Joined: 05 Feb 2003 19:59
Location: Northeast PA
Contact:
Post
by jhibbs » 12 Dec 2003 13:56
i was just wondering the same about phasing set, which i just started working on... i think it should just because there is still a XBD component to op side. then again i dont really care either way.
_____________________________________________
J Trevorr Hibbs
Chris Holden
Dolla Llama
Posts: 886 Joined: 14 May 2002 10:44
Location: Fairfax, VA. USA
Contact:
Post
by Chris Holden » 15 Dec 2003 08:40
wolfpac444 wrote: Anyone who voted "No" care to explain why?
X-dex, that's all I've got.