Non-clipper Paradox Moves

Talk about your big add moves and concepts in here.
Post Reply

Does toe swirling paradox/far whirl deserve the paradox add?

Yes
14
74%
No
5
26%
 
Total votes: 19

User avatar
wolfpac444
Your Friendly Admin
Posts: 1890
Joined: 24 Mar 2003 00:07

Non-clipper Paradox Moves

Post by wolfpac444 »

I was having a discussion about this a few days ago. I guess I'll just start it out simple, and we can go from there.

Does toe swirling paradox/far whirl get the paradox add despite the common thinking that paradox moves need to set from clipper?
Mike Hansen
User avatar
ted
Atomsmashasaurus Dex
Posts: 790
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 10:34
Location: CO
Contact:

Post by ted »

No!?! :x
You people are sick!
Do you realize how much of a hip pivot toe swirling>far component is?
SO HARD.
Theodore Anderson
User avatar
wolfpac444
Your Friendly Admin
Posts: 1890
Joined: 24 Mar 2003 00:07

Post by wolfpac444 »

Anyone who voted "No" care to explain why?
Mike Hansen
User avatar
jhibbs
Shredaholic
Posts: 197
Joined: 05 Feb 2003 19:59
Location: Northeast PA
Contact:

Post by jhibbs »

i was just wondering the same about phasing set, which i just started working on... i think it should just because there is still a XBD component to op side. then again i dont really care either way.
_____________________________________________
J Trevorr Hibbs
User avatar
Chris Holden
Dolla Llama
Posts: 886
Joined: 14 May 2002 10:44
Location: Fairfax, VA. USA
Contact:

Post by Chris Holden »

wolfpac444 wrote:Anyone who voted "No" care to explain why?
X-dex, that's all I've got.
Post Reply