Fusion - 5 adds or 6
-
Senor Grommet
- Post Master General
- Posts: 3394
- Joined: 18 Oct 2002 20:25
- Location: Greater Santa Cruz, CA
-
hacksterbator
- Washed-Up Child Star
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: 12 Jul 2003 18:33
- Location: Winterpeg, Manisnowba
- Contact:
jer: i agree with part of your thought on this, yeah fusion doesn't have the same difficulty as other sixs, but i don't see why this wouldn't count for x-dex. why shouldn't the double down be broken into a full dex and a half dex? it makes more sense to do that then to say it doesn't get the x-dex because it's even more than a full dex. same with fury, break it down into a full dex, a half dex, and an other full dex. or nemisis even; full dex, half dex, full dex, half dex. nemesis definatly is one of the hardest 6's around. why shouldn't it be a seven (since we're using the add system as a way of determining difficulty [which of course doesn't always work]).
A.G.
- ShredStylez
- Republican
- Posts: 851
- Joined: 16 Feb 2003 19:37
- Location: Michigan
- Contact:
Moves that would get an x dex under the "you can't split the dexes up" theory
Atomsmasher
Reactor
Sumo
shooting mirage
tunguska
toe blur
blurry blur
there are obviously others.
The reason why I don't think you should split up the dexes is because it's just one action - you do one movement, which dexes the bag twice. If I saw someone do an omlette bailed to a ss butterfly - two distinct dexing actions on the one foot, then that move should get an x dex.
Atomsmasher
Reactor
Sumo
shooting mirage
tunguska
toe blur
blurry blur
there are obviously others.
The reason why I don't think you should split up the dexes is because it's just one action - you do one movement, which dexes the bag twice. If I saw someone do an omlette bailed to a ss butterfly - two distinct dexing actions on the one foot, then that move should get an x dex.
-
hacksterbator
- Washed-Up Child Star
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: 12 Jul 2003 18:33
- Location: Winterpeg, Manisnowba
- Contact: